sca-bpel message

Subject: Re: [sca-bpel] ISSUE 42: SBPEL3004 has an incorrect 'MAY'.

From: Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>
To: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:33:02 -0700

Mike Edwards wrote:

OFA9648EFB.5A9C9B33-ON802575B7.0021A2A7-802575B7.002AE5FC@uk.ibm.com" type="cite">
Danny,

Thanks for your investigative work.

I am happy with your proposal to remove SPBEL3004 as a normative statement - but I would instead recommend replacing it with a non-normative
explanatory sentence:

"In order to have an SCA multi-valued reference in a WS-BPEL process, a variable is declared in the process which uses the sca-bpel:multireference extension element"

OFA9648EFB.5A9C9B33-ON802575B7.0021A2A7-802575B7.002AE5FC@uk.ibm.com" type="cite">

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

References:
- [sca-bpel] NEW ISSUE: SBPEL3004 has an incorrect 'MAY'.
  - From: "Najeeb Andrabi" <nandrabi@tibco.com>
- RE: [sca-bpel] ISSUE 42: SBPEL3004 has an incorrect 'MAY'.
  - From: Michael Rowley <michael.rowley@activevos.com>
- Re: [sca-bpel] ISSUE 42: SBPEL3004 has an incorrect 'MAY'.
  - From: Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>
- Re: [sca-bpel] ISSUE 42: SBPEL3004 has an incorrect 'MAY'.
  - From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>