RE: [sca-bpel] Issue 49: BPEL process QName is assumed to be unique

[Michael Rowley <michael.rowley@activevos.com>]

PROPOSAL:

Section 1.0 currently includes the following sentence: "[SBPEL1001] The process attribute of the <implementation.bpel> element MUST be the QName of an executable WS-BPEL process."

The following sentence should be added immediately after the sentence quoted above:

"SCA's artifact resolution mechanism, defined in section 11.2 of the SCA Assembly Specification, MUST resolve the specified QName to a single WS-BPEL process."

Michael


-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:59 PM
To: OASIS BPEL
Subject: [sca-bpel] Issue 49: BPEL process QName is assumed to be unique

This is a new issue based on a PR comment, per my AI.
http://osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-49

PR 01 comment filed at: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel-comment/200906/msg00002.html

The BPEL specification does not say that the BPEL process QName is
unique. The SCA BPEL C&I spec assumes that it is, but does not state
this assumption in the spec.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php