Re: [sca-bpel] [ISSUE 62] More on multiplicity 0..1 - Updated Proposal

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

Thanks to Danny for completing his part
of the necessary changes.

I've uploaded a new version of the proposal
that contains my changes on top of Danny's:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/download.php/36479/sca-bpel-1.1-spec-cd02-rev7-Issue62b.doc


Changes that I have made:

1. In section 2.1.1, separated out [SBPEL2025]
from bullet #4 to make it stand alone.  Adjusted the
wording so that it now applies to both
0..1 and 1..1 multiplicity references.

2. In section 3.2, created a new normative
statement which is the equivalent to SBPEL2025 for 0..n and 1..n multiplicity
references.
This is [SBPEL3029].  It makes
what was previously a non-normative piece of text into a normative statement

3. Section 3.5 ("Danny's"
new section). Gave each new normative statement a final number like SBPEL3026.
Also tinkered with the formatting.



I also note that we have some editorial
work to do to bring the BPEL spec into line with the format adopted by
most of the other
TCs..  In particular:

a. Every diagram should have a caption
containing a number.

b. Every code example should be cleanly
separated from the surrounding text (grey background, line above and line
below) and each
should have a caption containing a number.

c. All references to "code"
examples and to diagrams should be done using the number.

d. All normative statements should have
a background colour of yellow.  At the moment it is impossible to
determine where a normative 
statement ends.


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>
To:	OASIS BPEL <sca-bpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	18/02/2010 20:13
Subject:	Re: [sca-bpel] [ISSUE 62] More on multiplicity 0..1 -  Updated Proposal

---

New document uploaded here:

As per the call today, I have taken Mike's proposal and made the following
changes:

minor typo corrections.  pseudo-numbering of normative statements.

For the following comment:
anish:  the 1st stmt in section 3.5 should be moved
to the conformance section

- I have removed the 1st statement in 3.5.  It is covered, IMO by
the conformance section 5.2.2

2.               The implementation MUST support the SCA BPEL extensions defined in Section 3, and MUST implement them as defined.

For the following comment:

anish: the 1st SBPELXXXX, do we need it. Or is the fact that this is used in a WS-BPEL doc and therefore WS-BPEL rules apply

- I have removed the entire statement.  As Dieter pointed out, it is most likely covered by WS-BPEL itself.

For the following comments:

MikeE: few stmts contain 2119 stmt but not marked as such
 
... there is a MUST and a SHOULD that is unmarked
 
... the sentence "This function determines whether the partnerRole of the specified partnerLink is set. The argument names the partnerLink, and it MUST have the following properties" doesn't need the MUST
 
... the other stmt that is unmarked is "These properties SHOULD be enforced by static analysis."
<Dieter Koenig> = SBPEL5002
Dieter: SBPEL5002 already covered the SHOULD, so can be removed

- I have reworded to get rid of the leading MUST, and deleted the sentence with the trailing SHOULD


On 2/11/2010 3:43 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:

Folks,

I have done the work item assigned to me in relation to Issue 62 and I have posted an updated document here:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/download.php/36347/sca-bpel-1.1-spec-cd02-rev7-Issue62A.doc

Comments welcome

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU