[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SBPEL1001 contains two conformance stmts
SBPEL1001 currently contains two sentences with their own MUSTs. I see the two statements as independently marked assertion statements (wrt appendix B). SBPEL1001 currently say: "The process attribute of the <implementation.bpel> element MUST be the QName of an executable WS-BPEL process. SCA's artifact resolution mechanism, defined in section 11.2 of the SCA Assembly Specification, MUST be used to resolve the specified QName to a WS-BPEL process." I believe this is just an ed issue of splitting and IDing the statements. -Anish --
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]