[7:54] anish: Date: 2010-03-18
[7:55] Danny van der Rijn I'll be on the call in a few mins - I can scribe - it's probably my turn anyway
[8:03] anish: Chair: Sanjay Patil
[8:03] anish: Scribe: Danny van der Rijn
[8:03] anish: ScribeNick: Danny van der Rijn
[8:04] Danny van der Rijn thanks, anish - I never get those Schreiber tags correct..
[8:04] Ashok gotta step away for a bit
[8:04] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: Agenda Bashing
[8:04] Danny van der Rijn: Agenda approved
[8:05] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: Approval of 2010-03-11 minutes
[8:05] Danny van der Rijn: Minutes approved w/o objection
[8:05] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: #0125 Anish Produce test assertions for SBPEL2023 + changes in TA for issue 58 resolution
[8:06] Danny van der Rijn: s/ /8 )/
[8:07] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: Editorial work still needed; but as far as assertions themselves, I believe we are done.
[8:07] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: Are we going to mark the assertions as testable or not testable? Haven't gone through doc looking for that. If so, non-editorial work to be done
[8:07] Danny van der Rijn what's the tag for an AI to close?
[8:08] anish i don't think there is, or at least I don't know what it is
[8:08] Danny van der Rijn: AI #0125 closed
[8:09] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: AI #127 (SCA-BPEL 1.1 CD02 Revision
[8:09] Danny van der Rijn: closed
[8:09] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: #0128 Anish to update the TA spec to be in sync with the latest spec
[8:09] Danny van der Rijn: closed
[8:09] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: New Issues
[8:12] Danny van der Rijn: Motion: Anish moves to accept Issue 63, s Danny
[8:12] Danny van der Rijn: Motion passes unanimously
[8:12] anish: "If the attribute sca-bpel:ignore does not have a value of "true" and neither of the attributes sca-bpel:service or sca-bpel:reference
are present on the partner link..."
[8:15] Danny van der Rijn: Discussion on whether "canonical" is needed
[8:16] anish: If the attribute sca-bpel:ignore does not have a value of "true" and neither of the attributes sca-bpel:service or sca-bpel:reference
are present on the partner link, then if a static analysis of the process determines that it is possible that the first message for a partner link will be received in a <receive> activity, the <onMessage> element of a <pick> activity or the <onEvent> element of an event handler then the introspected component type MUST include an SCA service that corresponds to the partner link in the component type.
[8:19] Danny van der Rijn: Motion: Resolve Issue 63 by replacing the current 2005 text with the text above in the chat (m Anish, s Martin)
[8:19] Danny van der Rijn: s/2005/SBPEL2005/
[8:19] Danny van der Rijn: Sanjay: Does this proposal have any impact on the test assertions?
[8:20] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: It's possible. TA text may be inaccurate. Checking quickly. Yes, the prereq needs to reflect that
[8:21] anish: SBL-TA-2003
[8:21] Danny van der Rijn: Amendment: Amend SBL-TA-2003 similarly (editorial action) (m Danny, s Anish)
[8:22] Danny van der Rijn: Amendment passes w/o objection
[8:22] Danny van der Rijn: Amended motion passes w/o objection
[8:23] Danny van der Rijn: Action: Editors to update spec with Issue 63 resolution
[8:23] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: Status of spec/TA
[8:24] Danny van der Rijn: Sanjay: Rev 8 includes all issues except Issue 63. TA revision 15 is similarly up to date
[8:24] Danny van der Rijn: s/ /8 )/
[8:25] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: SBPEL1001 contains 2 MUST statements, each with different targets. Important to label with different tags.
[8:26] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: 1st target is composite. 2nd target is SCA Runtime
[8:27] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: "SCA Runtime" means "SCA-BPEL Runtime"
[8:29] Danny van der Rijn: Sanjay: We should treat this as an editorial issue.
[8:29] Danny van der Rijn: Sanjay: Any objection to creating such an editorial action?
[8:29] Danny van der Rijn: no objection heard
[8:30] Danny van der Rijn: Action: Editors to update specification and TA doc as per Anish's comments
[8:30] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: Testing
[8:30] Danny van der Rijn: Sanjay: No progress to report from Anish or Sanjay yet.
[8:31] Danny van der Rijn 2014 and 1328
[8:32] anish: SBPEL2014] If a partner link is marked with initializePartnerRole="yes" then any component that uses this business process as an implementation MUST configure the corresponding service or reference using binding, promotion and wiring configuration that guarantees that the partner link's partner role will be initialized as soon as the partner link becomes active. If the partner link is mapped to a service, the callback binding would be the relevant binding for this requirement.
[8:32] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: this is 2 statements. Last sentence isn't needed as part of 2014
[8:33] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: Statement is useful, just not highlighted as part of 2014 or in the TA
[8:34] Danny van der Rijn: Anish: proposes an editorial AI to do so
[8:34] Danny van der Rijn: Action: Editors to remove 2nd sentence from highlighting and remove 2nd sentence from TA table
[8:34] anish: [SBPEL2028] The NCName specified by the sca-bpel:isPartnerRoleSet function argument MUST be the name of an in-scope partnerLink in the WS-BPEL process. The partnerLink referred to is determined by standard WS-BPEL lexical scoping rules.
[8:36] anish: s/2028/3028/
[8:38] Danny van der Rijn: Dieter: probably just a cut-and-paste error
[8:40] Danny van der Rijn: Action: Editors to remove 2nd sentence of SBPEL3028 from highlighting and TA table in appendix
[8:40] Danny van der Rijn: Topic: AOB
[8:40] Danny van der Rijn: none
[8:40] Danny van der Rijn: Adjourned at 8:41 am PDT
|
Spec: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201003/msg00008.html
: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/document.php?document_id=36830
Spec: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201003/msg00008.html