sca-c-cpp message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: NEW ISSUE: C++ componentType file name and location
- From: Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>
- To: sca-c-cpp@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:36:51 -0500
TARGET: C++ C&I Specification
Description: We need to finalize
the name and location of componentType files as well as any other SCDL
metadata related to componentType files.
Key points from the assembly specification:
- Lines 482-483 of WD01 state that the
componentType file has the same name as the implementation file but the
extension .componentType. But the location is implementation technology
dependent (lines 484-486).
- In the SCDL, the component only defines
the componentType indirectly via the implementation.xxx
- The componentType schema does not
provide a name for a componentType
As I see the requirements:
- The information in implementation.xxx
must uniquely identify the componentType file.
- It needs to be possible to find the
file in a simple manner.
- It is reasonable to expect multiple
component implementations to be compiled into a single DLL/shared library/etc.
Proposal:
Naming: There are two choices.
1) The implementation name is considered
to be the implementation header name. This implies an implementation
header MUST only contain one class defining a componentType (it MAY contain
other classes).
2) The implementation name is considered
to be the implementation class name. This means if the implementation
class is the only class in the header file then the header file must be
parsed to find the class name. Alternatively we could make the implementation
class attribute required.
I favor option 1 as the least metadata
to specify and being consistent with common programming practice.
Location: The current text requires
a header file that declares the implementation class and that this file
be available from the SCA registry/repository - specifically using a relative
path from the composite root. The logical place for the componentType
file to be placed is in the same directory as the implementation header
file. The only reason I can think of to do something different is
if we believe there is a requirement to place implementation header files
in a directory with restricted access and componentType files in a publically
readable directory. I do not believe this is a requirement.
Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Master Inventor
Research Triangle Park, NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]