OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-c-cpp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Packaging sections



The packaging sections of our specifications are a bit out of date with the current Assembly specification.  The Assembly specification defines contributions which contain deployable composites as well as imports (artifacts referenced that are outside of the contribution) and exports (parts of a composite that can be referenced by other composites).  Imports and exports are defined as extension points.  There is no mention of contributions in the packaging sections of our specifications, nor is there any discussion of using imports to point to executables that may be outside of a contribution.

Before raising any issues, I would like to have a discussion about the extent of what we need/want to say in light of the current definitions of contributions.  Some specific discussion points:
1) Should we rework the example as a composite?
2) Should the example show an composite containing other composites?
3) Should we define import.cpp and import.c which could point to an external executable.

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Master Inventor

Research Triangle Park,  NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]