ISSUE 83: Proposed response

[Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>]

I propose that we respond to this comment
with the following  (this would part of a e-mail that is a response
to all of his comments):

Local and remotable interfaces for SCA
are defined in the Assembly specification and are independent of the component
implementation technology/language.  The C++ Client and Implementation
specification only defines how interfaces are designated remotable or local
for C++ and interprets the requirements for remotable interfaces for C++.

Because the concepts of local and remotable
interfaces for SCA are defined in the Assembly specification and can be
applied to any SCA component implementation technology/language, a overall
architectural discussion of SCA local and remotable interfaces and how
the compare to other technologies would need to be addressed by the SCA
Assembly TC

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

Research Triangle Park,  NC 
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com