RE: [sca-j-editors] Editorial changes to CAA spec

["Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com>]

Hi,

I'm happy to put my changes [2] in next week. The only thing that
concerns me slightly is that I am putting my own review comments in.
Does this really matter? Possibly not - as the document will be reviewed
by the TC.

Mark

Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park | St.
Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 |
mcombellack@avaya.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Booz [mailto:booz@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: 22 May 2008 13:16
> To: sca-j-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [sca-j-editors] Editorial changes to CAA spec
> 
> I'd be happy to take on [3,4,5] this week.  I'm on vacation all next
week.
> Maybe we can get Mark to do [2] next week?
> 
> Dave Booz
> STSM, SCA and WebSphere Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
> http://washome.austin.ibm.com/xwiki/bin/view/SCA2Team/WebHome
> 
> 
> 
>              Anish Karmarkar
>              <Anish.Karmarkar@
>              oracle.com>
To
>
sca-j-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>              05/22/2008 02:35
cc
>              AM                        Michael
Beisiegel/Somers/IBM@IBMUS
>
Subject
>                                        [sca-j-editors] Editorial
changes
>                                        to CAA spec
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I took an AI last week to coordinate amongst the editors and come up
> with a deadline for our AI to update the CAA spec with all the
editorial
> changes.
> 
> The editorial changes come from Mike [1], Mark [2] and Simon
[3][4][5].
> Mike's changes contained both ed changes as well as RFC 2119 changes.
I
> have updated the WD (attached) to include only the ed changes and not
> the 2119 changes as agreed on the concall two weeks ago. The attached
> doc also contains the fix to include description of
> InvalidServiceException that Dave had pointed out.
> 
> So we have [2], [3], [4] and [5] as TODO. We agreed two weeks ago to
> split the work. If we split it, I don't think it is that much work.
> Could we agree to finish this by next week, i.e., 29th May?
> 
> Pl. let me know.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200804/msg00036.html
> [2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200805/msg00002.html
> [3] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200804/msg00070.html
> [4] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200804/msg00071.html
> [5] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200804/msg00072.html
> [attachment "sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD03.doc" deleted by David
> Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php