NEW ISSUE: Conversation Attributes

[Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>]

Title:
Conversation Attributes are not in Java Schema 

Target: Java Schema in  Assembly Model Specification

Description:  The conversation
attributes defined by @Conversation Attributes in the
initial working draft of the Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification
do not exist in the initial working
draft of the Assembly Model Specification.
 While this may not be a problem it is an inconsistency in so far
as the other annotations all impact SCDL.  It should also be noted
that Java typically sets the pattern for other language bindings.  

Proposal:  No specific proposal at this time.


Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Master Inventor

Research Triangle Park,  NC 
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Bryan
Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM on 10/17/2007 03:16 PM -----

"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com>

10/17/2007 02:35 PM

To	Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [sca-j] @ConversationAttributes

I believe this should be raised
as an issue for SCA-J.  There is some chance that conversation attributes
should map to policy sets rather than to new assembly model constructs,
so I would hold off on raising this as an issue to another TC until we
have an idea of who should get it.
 
Michael

---

From: Bryan Aupperle [mailto:aupperle@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 10:03 AM
To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [sca-j] @ConversationAttributes
 

I was looking at the annotations related to conversations in the initial
working draft of the Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification and
the Java schemas in the initial working draft of the Assembly Model Specification
and noticed that there is nothing in the schema corresponding to the conversation
attributes defined by the @ConversationAttributes.  Am I misreading
something, is this intentional, or is there something missing from the
schema? 

I was prompted to look at this by reviewing the conversation related annotations
for C++ and C and noticing some differences.  My concern is primarily
that we do things with appropriate consistency across the various languages.

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Master Inventor

Research Triangle Park,  NC 
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com