[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] package names
Bryan, There has only been brief mention that such a change might be needed or desirable. There is no sca-j issue open for this. It is potentially related (but not tied) to what decisions are made about XML namespaces. My own view is that we should not change the package names unless the sca-j TC changes the APIs in an incompatible way. Simon Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer Member of the IBM Academy of Technology Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999 Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> 13/12/2007 17:11 To sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org cc Subject [sca-j] package names I know that this is a minor thing, but has there been any discussion about needing to change the package names from org.osoa.sca... to something else - potentially org.oasis.sca... or org.oasis-open.sca...? Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D. STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect Research Triangle Park, NC +1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508) Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]