OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
86 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 29 Feb 2008 01:32:07 -0000
ISSUE-28: Package Name Changes
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 28 Feb 2008 23:44:50 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Feb 2008 18:26:58 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mrowley@bea.com on 28 Feb 2008 16:08:35 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Feb 2008 14:42:51 -0000
ISSUE-27: Security Annotations in generated Component Type
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 28 Feb 2008 13:58:58 -0000
ISSUE-29: Specification inconsistent - states that callbacks can be used for both local and remote services and elsewhere says only for remote service interfaces
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 28 Feb 2008 13:46:53 -0000
New javacaa version uploaded
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 28 Feb 2008 09:53:13 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification (sca-javacaa-draft-20080228.pdf) uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 28 Feb 2008 09:43:22 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification (sca-javacaa-draft-20080228.doc) uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 28 Feb 2008 09:41:11 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 27 Feb 2008 23:43:31 -0000
Groups - First draft agenda for Boston F2F (F2Fagenda.txt) uploaded
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 27 Feb 2008 23:22:03 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2008 22:58:20 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-02-21.doc uploaded
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 27 Feb 2008 22:37:52 -0000
Groups - Status of Open Issues (OpenIssues.html) uploaded
From
mrowley@bea.com on 27 Feb 2008 21:38:10 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Security Annotations in generated Component Type
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 27 Feb 2008 20:28:42 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 27 Feb 2008 13:38:41 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 13:51:49 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 25 Feb 2008 20:04:29 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Feb 2008 18:30:20 -0000
FW: Warning - US Daylight Savings time and European Summer time discrepancy
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 25 Feb 2008 17:43:45 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 25 Feb 2008 16:10:54 -0000
Re: AW: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Referenceinstances
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Feb 2008 14:40:05 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Feb 2008 14:11:22 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Feb 2008 13:48:58 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 23 Feb 2008 16:05:52 -0000
AW: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 22 Feb 2008 18:26:05 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 22 Feb 2008 17:49:03 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 22 Feb 2008 17:31:05 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 22 Feb 2008 17:28:56 -0000
RE: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 22 Feb 2008 17:19:22 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Shih-Chang Chen <shih-chang.chen@oracle.com> on 22 Feb 2008 15:08:20 -0000
Re: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Feb 2008 14:31:01 -0000
Re: [sca-j] AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Feb 2008 11:14:08 -0000
AW: ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 21 Feb 2008 22:15:41 -0000
ISSUE 8: Concurrency model for Service Reference instances
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 21 Feb 2008 19:45:43 -0000
raw minutes of Feb 21 telecon
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 21 Feb 2008 19:16:32 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Package Name Changes
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 21 Feb 2008 18:49:47 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Property reinjection - is this covered by Issue-4?
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Feb 2008 15:34:42 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Property reinjection - is this covered by Issue-4?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Feb 2008 15:10:18 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Specification inconsistent - states that callbacks can be used for both local and remote services and elsewhere says only for remote service interfaces
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 21 Feb 2008 15:09:33 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Property reinjection - is this covered by Issue-4?
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 21 Feb 2008 15:03:54 -0000
Property reinjection - is this covered by Issue-4?
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 21 Feb 2008 14:27:53 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 21 Feb 2008 09:56:14 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-02-14 (SCA Java Minutes 2008-02-14.doc) uploaded
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 21 Feb 2008 09:19:30 -0000
raw transcript of 2/14/08 java TC call
From
Michael Beisiegel <mbgl@us.ibm.com> on 14 Feb 2008 19:39:36 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 14 Feb 2008 17:13:33 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 14 Feb 2008 15:22:01 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 14 Feb 2008 10:02:41 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mrowley@bea.com on 14 Feb 2008 00:40:40 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-02-07.doc uploaded
From
mrowley@bea.com on 13 Feb 2008 22:59:29 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2008 22:26:03 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Callback Simplification
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 13 Feb 2008 15:00:34 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 13 Feb 2008 14:58:35 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 13 Feb 2008 14:58:28 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2008 13:31:00 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2008 10:24:55 -0000
ISSUE 26: Description of interface.java is needed
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 13 Feb 2008 09:43:35 -0000
ISSUE-25 Callback Simplification
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 13 Feb 2008 09:42:09 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Callback Simplification
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2008 09:31:16 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Callback Simplification
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 12 Feb 2008 22:48:05 -0000
Java Callback Simplification Proposal
From
Jim Marino <jmarino@bea.com> on 12 Feb 2008 18:24:07 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Description of interface.java is needed
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 17:03:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] March 6,7 SCA-J F2F in Burlington, MA
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 08:37:23 -0000
In memory conversational state, was RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 12: Relation betweenconversational annotation and scope conversation
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 11 Feb 2008 21:09:11 -0000
March 6,7 SCA-J F2F in Burlington, MA
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 11 Feb 2008 17:10:57 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 4 - Proposed spec text for dependency reinjection
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 11 Feb 2008 15:40:05 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 4 - Proposed spec text for dependency reinjection
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 11 Feb 2008 10:58:58 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 4 - Proposed spec text for dependency reinjection
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 10 Feb 2008 22:40:16 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 4 - Proposed spec text for dependency reinjection
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 9 Feb 2008 17:09:07 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 12: Relation between conversational annotation and scope conversation
From
"Peshev, Peter" <peter.peshev@sap.com> on 8 Feb 2008 12:02:23 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 12: Relation between conversational annotation and scopeconversation
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Feb 2008 11:50:36 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 12: Relation between conversational annotation and scope conversation
From
"Peshev, Peter" <peter.peshev@sap.com> on 8 Feb 2008 11:44:50 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 12: Relation between conversational annotation and scopeconversation
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Feb 2008 11:39:39 -0000
RE: Raw minutes 7th Feb 08
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 7 Feb 2008 21:16:09 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 12: Relation between conversational annotation and scope conversation
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 7 Feb 2008 19:33:29 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 4 - Proposed spec text for dependency reinjection
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 7 Feb 2008 19:05:30 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 12: Relation between conversational annotation and scope conversation
From
"Peshev, Peter" <peter.peshev@sap.com> on 7 Feb 2008 18:03:53 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 12: Relation between conversational annotation and scopeconversation
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 7 Feb 2008 17:38:10 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mrowley@bea.com on 6 Feb 2008 20:37:53 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-01-31.doc uploaded
From
mrowley@bea.com on 6 Feb 2008 19:47:49 -0000
Groups - Issue_4_Resolution_01.doc uploaded
From
mrowley@bea.com on 6 Feb 2008 19:26:46 -0000
NEW ISSUE: The EJB bindings specification should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 5 Feb 2008 20:15:04 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 11: Semantics of getCallbackID() are underspecified
From
"Peshev, Peter" <peter.peshev@sap.com> on 1 Feb 2008 14:39:21 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 11: Semantics of getCallbackID() are underspecified
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 1 Feb 2008 11:03:10 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 4 - Proposed spec text for dependency reinjection
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 1 Feb 2008 10:45:28 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2