sca-j message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
- From: Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:01:06 +0000
Last week I took an action to produce
a written up proposal for callback simplification by today. I have
uploaded this to the document repository as
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/27649/JAVA-25-Proposal.doc.
The content of this proposal corresponds
to the "Callback Simplification" section of the proposal sent
out by Michael R, and does not address the changes proposed in the "API
Simplification" section. I think it is best to have these discussions
separately.
This proposal corresponds to what I
was describing at the sca-j F2F with two changes / additions:
1. Outstanding callbacks don't pin conversational
objects after the conversation's creator has ended the conversation.
2. In all cases, the caller of a bidirectional
interface creates the callback EPR that will be used (including any reference
parameters needed).
I believe the issues that still need
to be discussed and resolved are as follows:
a) Should all 4 combinations of conversational
and non-conversational forward and callback interfaces be allowed, or only
2 of these?
b) Should the callback interface used
to make callbacks to a conversation-scoped component be marked as conversational?
c) Should each forward request within
a conversation generate a unique ID that is not part of business data and
is returned with the callback?
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]