Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the methoditself?

[Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com>]

Vamsi,
JAVA-33 is resolved.  Please see
the minutes of the sca-j call of April 3.  The proposed wording change
in the JIRA was adopted.  The point you are making was raised (by
myself!) when the TC discussed the motion to resolve the issue.  Other
TC members felt that the proposed wording was sufficiently clear, so I
did not press this to a vote.  Are you OK with the wording that was
adopted, or do you want to reopen the issue with a proposal to change the
wording?

    Simon

Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156  Fax +44-1962-818999

C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com>

28/04/2008 05:05

To	Simon Nash/UK/IBM@IBMGB
cc	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the method itself?

Hi Simon,

Thank you for pointing to JAVA-33.  I failed to locate that issue
since
"Java Common Annotations and APIs specification" is not marked
as the
component affected by this issue.  I don't think JAVA-33 is resolved
yet as
I notice that the text in section 2.1.4 of v1.1 draft does not reflect
the
resolution and even the status at http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-33
is still shown as "New".  Though the current proposal for
JAVA-33 changes
"setter method parameter" to "setter method", it is
not the setter method
but the parameter to the setter method that is typed by the service
interface.  I am alright if my proposed resolution gets considered
under
JAVA-33 itself.

++Vamsi


                    
                     
                     
          
             Simon Nash      
                     
                     
 
             <NASH@uk.ibm.com>  
                     
                    
                    
                     
                     
       To 
             28/04/2008 03:00    
     sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org        
 
                    
                     
                     
       cc 
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
  Subject 
                    
                  Re: [sca-j]
@Reference annotation   
                    
                  on setter
method parameter or the   
                    
                  method itself?
                     
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          




Vamsi,
This appears to be a duplicate of JAVA-33.  Were you intending to
reopen
that issue (which would require a 2/3 majority), or are you OK with the
change made to this text by the resolution to JAVA-33?

    Simon

Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156  Fax +44-1962-818999


                    
                     
                     
          
 C Vamsi                  
                     
                     
    
 <vamsic007@in.ibm.com>            
                     
                 
                    
                     
                     
       To 
 26/04/2008 09:51                
           sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org  
 
                    
                     
                     
       cc 
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
  Subject 
                    
                     
  [sca-j] @Reference annotation 
                    
                     
  on setter method parameter or 
                    
                     
  the method itself?            
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          





DESCRIPTION:
Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification v1.00 - Sec 1.2.2 - Lines
245 to 246:
245 Accessing a service using reference injection is done by defining a
field, a setter method parameter, or a
246 constructor parameter typed by the service interface and annotated
with
an @Reference annotation.

From the above it could be interpreted that the parameter to the setter
method can be annotated with @Reference whereas section 1.8.14 does not
talk about or give an example where a parameter to the setter method is
annotated with @Reference, but mentions that the setter method itself (not
the input parameter) should be annotated with @Reference.

PROPOSAL: Change lines 245 and 246 to read the following:
Accessing a service using reference injection is done by defining a field,
a setter method with input parameter typed by the service interface, or
a
constructor parameter typed by the service interface and annotated with
an
@Reference annotation.

++Vamsi


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php











Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU