sca-j message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: equals() method on ServiceReference andCallableReference
- From: Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 18:02:14 +0100
Mark,
What does it mean for two service references
to be equal? They could have different bindings (and therefore completely
different endpoint URIs) but connect to the same SCA service. If
we want to support equality for such cases, I think the serialized form
of a service reference would have to contain some unique ID for the service
that it connects to. It's not clear to me how this unique ID could
be generated reliably. Defining this would require an SCA Assembly
issue, not an SCA Java issue.
Then there's the question of what effect
the intents/policysets applying to a service reference have on its equality
semantics. If I have two service references for the same service,
but one is secure and one isn't, are they equal? For the use case
you have in mind, would you want them to be treated as equal?
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
20/05/2008 15:45
Please respond to
ashok.malhotra@oracle.com |
|
To
| Mark Combellack <mcombellack@avaya.com>
|
cc
| sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: equals() method
on ServiceReference and CallableReference |
|
If the equals method involves comparing URIs for equality,
do we need to
say some words
about how URIs should be compared? I can provide some words if needed.
All the best, Ashok
Mark Combellack wrote:
>
> RAISER: Mark Combellack
>
> TARGET: SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs
>
> DESCRIPTION:
>
> The equals() and hashCode() methods are some of the fundamental Java
> Object methods that are used for comparing objects. The SCA Java
> specifications do not describe what should happen when the equals()
or
> hashCode() methods are called on a ServiceReference or CallableReference.
>
> Without an explicit statement, SCA developers will not know whether
> they can compare ServiceReferences and CallableReferences.
>
> I’ve sent an email to the SCA-Java list (see link below) that contains
> an example usage scenario.
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200805/msg00037.html
>
>
> PROPOSAL:
>
> Update the specification to state that the equals() method for
> ServiceReference can be used to test whether they refer to the same
> target.
>
> Update the specification to state that the equals() method for
> CallableReference can be used to test whether they refer to the same
> target.
>
> Update the specification to state that the hashCode() method for
> ServiceReference and CallableReference must comply with the hashCode()
> contract as defined by Java - see
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Object.html#hashCode()
> <http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Object.html#hashCode%28%29>
>
>
> Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park
|
> St. Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 |
> mcombellack@avaya.com <mailto:%7Cmcombellack@avaya.com>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]