OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-j message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation



I take a slightly different view on this.  I think an unannotated implementation is exactly that.  I don't think it means that all the interfaces referenced by the implementation must also be unannotated.  However, I'm open to discussion on the best way to handle this.  Perhaps we need different rules for:
 1. Unannotated implementation / unannotated interfaces
 2. Unannotated implementation / annotated interfaces
 3. Annotated implementation

    Simon

Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156  Fax +44-1962-818999



Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB

27/08/2008 10:42

To
"OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect the Semantics of an Unannotated Implementation






Folks,


An @Local annotation would certainly affect the semantics of an unannotated implementation.


An interface so marked would clearly indicate something relating to an SCA reference.



Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com


From: C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com>
To: Simon Nash/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Cc: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 27/08/2008 09:09
Subject: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect the Semantics of an Unannotated Implementation






Simon,

Should the introduction of @Local annotation affect the "Semantics of an
Unannotated Implementation" (section 8 in sca-javaci-draft-20070926.doc)
where we are currently using only interfaces marked with @Remotable in
computing the references/properties of an implementation?

++Vamsi


                                                                         
           Simon Nash                                                    
           <NASH@uk.ibm.com>                                            
                                                                      To
           27/08/2008 12:57          sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org          
                                                                      cc
                                                                         
                                                                 Subject
                                     Re: [sca-j] Introspecting services  
                                     offered by a Java implementation    
                                     class without @Service              
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         




Raymond,
Minor nit: the @OneWay annotation applies to a method, not to an
interface.  Your example should be updated to show this.

In your example, these services are local.  Issue JAVA-3 has proposed a new
annotation @Local that could be used on Interface1and Interface2 to allow
them to be recognized by the introspection algorithm.

I believe this discussion can be handled under JAVA-3 and there is no need
to create a new issue.

   Simon

Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156  Fax +44-1962-818999


                                                                         
Raymond Feng                                                              
<rfeng@us.ibm.com>                                                        
                                                                      To
25/08/2008 17:25                            sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org    
                                                                      cc
                                                                         
                                                                 Subject
                                           [sca-j] Introspecting        
                                           services offered by a Java    
                                           implementation class without  
                                           @Service                      
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         





Hi,

In Java Component Implementation Specification 1.00, we have the following
statements:

143 1.2.1.3. Introspecting services offered by a Java implementation
144 In the cases described below, the services offered by a Java
implementation class may be determined
145 through introspection, eliding the need to specify them using @Service.
The following algorithm is used to
146 determine how services are introspected from an implementation class:
147 If the interfaces of the SCA services are not specified with the
@Service annotation on the implementation
148 class, it is assumed that all implemented interfaces that have been
annotated as @Remotable are the
149 service interfaces provided by the component. If none of the
implemented interfaces is remotable, then by
150 default the implementation offers a single service whose type is the
implementation class.

What if an interface is annotated with SCA annotations such as @OneWay or
@Callback?

For example:

public class MyServiceImpl implements Interface1, Interface2 {
}

@Callback(CallbackInterface.class)
public interface Interface1 {
}

@OneWay
public interface Interface2 {
}

By the spec, there is only one service named MyServiceImpl. But isn't it
more natural that we should find two SCA services: Interface1 and
Interface2? Please clarify.

Thanks,
Raymond


Raymond Feng
Senior Software Engineer, Open Source SCA Development, Apache Tuscany
Project
IBM Bay Area Lab, 1001 E Hillsdale Blvd, Suite 400, Foster City, CA 94404,
USA
E-mail: rfeng@us.ibm.com, Notes: Raymond Feng/Burlingame/IBM, Tel:
650-645-8117, T/L: 367-8117
Web & Blog:
www.enjoyjava.com - The Cyber Cafeteria to Enjoy Java












Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU









---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php








Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU












Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU








[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]