Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into agenerally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

You might like to be aware of a debate
that is taking place to remove the requirement for support of WSDL 2.0
interfaces, only requiring that interfaces
be mappable to WSDL 1.1 interfaces.


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	"Pradeep Simha" <psimha@tibco.com>
To:	<sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	16/09/2008 02:03
Subject:	[sca-j] NEW ISSUE: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0

---

TARGET: Java Common Annotations and APIs,
WD 04, section 8.16
 
DESCRIPTION: A remotable service SHOULD be
translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such as
WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0 
 
On lines 1556-1557, the sentence “A remotable
service can be published externally as a service and must be translatable
into a WSDL portType" implies support for WSDL 1.1 only.
 
PROPOSAL:
 
Replace the text with the following:
 
A remotable service can be published externally
as a service and SHOULD be translatable into a generally accepted standard
for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU