REF: sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD04.doc
I am noticing that in the document the use of a and an with annotations is
not
consistent. For e.g.,
Line 342: A @Reference to a conversational service is injected
Line 437: interfaces declare a @ConversationAttributes annotation, ...
Line 1437: The presence of a @Reference annotation is reflected ...
Line 1683: A @Service annotation with no attributes is meaningless ...
Line 1709-1710: a @WebService annotation on the class ...
Line 96-97: ... an @Reference annotation.
Line 255-256: ... an @OneWay annotation.
Line 263-264: ... an @Conversational annotation.
See [1] for original e-mail posted to the mailing list.
PROPOSAL:
Make the usage of a and an consistent when referring to annotations by
treating "@" as silent when used with annotation such that normal english
usage prevails. The following examples illustrate this proposal:
1. a @Reference annotation -- read as, "a reference annotation"
2. a @Conversational annotation -- read as, "a conversational annotation"
3. an @EagerInit annotation -- read as, "an eager-init annotation"
4. a @OneWay annotation -- read as, "a one-way annotation"
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200808/msg00080.html |
|