OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
103 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
RE: [sca-j] Next Telecon
From
"Pavlov, Plamen" <plamen.pavlov@sap.com> on 28 Nov 2008 07:51:04 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Next Telecon
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 27 Nov 2008 19:06:02 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Next Telecon
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2008 17:17:05 -0000
Next Telecon
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 27 Nov 2008 16:43:21 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-65 - SCA Lifecyle proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Nov 2008 14:52:01 -0000
Fw: Appealing TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Nov 2008 14:50:17 -0000
Appealing TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Nov 2008 13:18:17 -0000
JAVA-65 - SCA Lifecyle proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 26 Nov 2008 09:47:51 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-11-25 (SCA Java Minutes 2008-11-25.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 26 Nov 2008 08:54:55 -0000
Re: [sca-j] testing architecture
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 25 Nov 2008 13:19:47 -0000
Re: [Fwd: RE: [sca-j] testing architecture]
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Nov 2008 11:45:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] testing architecture
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Nov 2008 11:38:21 -0000
[Fwd: RE: [sca-j] testing architecture]
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 25 Nov 2008 06:02:33 -0000
Regular Test Subcommittee calls - Wednesdays @ 9:00 Pacific
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Nov 2008 23:48:09 -0000
Re: [sca-j] testing architecture
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 24 Nov 2008 23:10:43 -0000
Re: [sca-j] testing architecture
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 24 Nov 2008 14:00:09 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 24 Nov 2008 13:20:48 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] @Remotable annotation incorrectly marked as optional in Java EE spec - [JAVA-103]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 24 Nov 2008 13:12:36 -0000
[ISSUE 7] Support for JAX-WS style async methods - PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Nov 2008 23:47:10 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] @Remotable annotation incorrectly marked as optional in Java EEspec
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Nov 2008 09:53:27 -0000
Re: [sca-j] testing architecture
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Nov 2008 02:13:39 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 21 Nov 2008 21:20:23 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 21 Nov 2008 21:19:10 -0000
ISSUE-101: <interface.java/> element not fully described in Java CAAspecification
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 21 Nov 2008 20:55:43 -0000
ISSUE-102: Need to have a Name parameter on the @Service annotation
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 21 Nov 2008 20:55:32 -0000
Groups - Spring C&I Spec WD01 Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 21 Nov 2008 18:45:16 -0000
Groups - Spring C&I Spec WD01 PDF format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 21 Nov 2008 18:44:16 -0000
SCA JEE status
From
"Pavlov, Plamen" <plamen.pavlov@sap.com> on 21 Nov 2008 16:34:58 -0000
[ISSUE 58] SCA Spring C&I Specification does not have a normativedefinition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a Spring Applicationcontext - PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Nov 2008 16:29:09 -0000
[ISSUE 59] SCA Spring C & I specification does not state what happens whena Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple interfaces - PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Nov 2008 13:04:17 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Need to have a Name parameter on the @Service annotation
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Nov 2008 12:49:41 -0000
[ISSUE 39] Incorrect example in Java Component Implementation Spec v1.00 -Sec 1.2.4 -- PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Nov 2008 11:40:24 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] <interface.java/> element not fully described in Java CAAspecification
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Nov 2008 10:57:44 -0000
Re: [sca-policy] *** SCA Testing ***
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 19 Nov 2008 17:55:33 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] RE: [sca-j] Re: [sca-bindings] *** SCA Testing ***
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2008 17:34:59 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Re: [sca-bindings] *** SCA Testing ***
From
"Pavlov, Plamen" <plamen.pavlov@sap.com> on 19 Nov 2008 17:27:54 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] *** SCA Testing ***
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 19 Nov 2008 16:54:02 -0000
*** SCA Testing ***
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2008 16:37:00 -0000
"Long Running Request-Response Operations" - Assembly proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2008 11:00:46 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Face to Face Minutes 2008-11-11 to 2008-11-13 (SCA Java Face to Face Minutes 2008-11-11 to 2008-11-13.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 17 Nov 2008 15:01:26 -0000
[ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - updated proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Nov 2008 14:44:50 -0000
Reminder: SCA-J Conference call today cancelled.
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Nov 2008 13:37:34 -0000
testing architecture
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 14 Nov 2008 19:55:42 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Minutes for Thursday afternoon?
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 14 Nov 2008 14:46:37 -0000
Minutes for Thursday afternoon?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 14 Nov 2008 13:54:17 -0000
NEW ISSUE: RFC2119 Language is needed for all SCA-J Specifications
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 17:25:05 -0000
Photos of the whiteboard from the SCA-J Face to Face meeting
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Nov 2008 17:17:44 -0000
ISSUE-100: default requiredness for @Reference annotation is incorrect
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 16:03:06 -0000
ISSUE-99: @property and @reference cannot be final
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 16:03:05 -0000
ISSUE-97: no ability to attach different intents /PolicySets to differentservices and references
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 15:59:01 -0000
ISSUE-98: Can annotations be inherited
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 15:58:59 -0000
NEW ISSUE: default requiredness for @Reference annotation is incorrect
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 13 Nov 2008 15:02:47 -0000
Java F2F Meeting Minutes from Thursday 13th Morning
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 15:00:54 -0000
NEW ISSUE: @property and @reference cannot be final
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 13 Nov 2008 14:22:48 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Can annotations be inherited
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 13 Nov 2008 14:03:52 -0000
NEW ISSUE: no ability to attach different intents /PolicySets todifferent services and references
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 13 Nov 2008 13:59:12 -0000
ISSUE-96: Are annotations allowed on static methods
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 10:39:35 -0000
ISSUE-95: Simplified stateful implementation mechanism to replaceconversations
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 10:36:35 -0000
ISSUE-94: Missing normative guidance on the usage of annotations inunsupported ways
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Nov 2008 10:36:35 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 13 Nov 2008 09:29:18 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 13 Nov 2008 09:26:51 -0000
Raw chat room log of Nov 12
From
"Pradeep Simha" <psimha@tibco.com> on 12 Nov 2008 18:03:37 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Are annotations allowed on static methods
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 12 Nov 2008 17:04:14 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Simplified stateful implementation mechanism to replaceconversations
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Nov 2008 16:43:43 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Missing normative guidance on the usage of annotations inunsupported ways
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Nov 2008 15:24:32 -0000
SCA-J f2f Raw Chat from Nov 12, 2008 morning
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 12 Nov 2008 13:02:24 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 12 Nov 2008 08:48:19 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 12 Nov 2008 08:42:36 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Raw chat log of 2008-11-11 ALL DAY
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 11 Nov 2008 18:01:21 -0000
Raw chat log of 2008-11-11 morning session
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 11 Nov 2008 13:40:13 -0000
[ISSUE 1] Updated Proposal material
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 11 Nov 2008 10:33:40 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Nov 2008 09:10:26 -0000
Fwd: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 11 Nov 2008 08:08:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] RE: Appeal of the OASIS decision on SCA-J package names
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 10 Nov 2008 21:56:35 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 10 Nov 2008 17:28:11 -0000
[sca-j] Agenda for SCA-J Face to Face - 11th to 13th November 2008 - Updated
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 10 Nov 2008 10:01:06 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 10 Nov 2008 09:52:48 -0000
SCA-J Face to Face logistics - November 11th to 13th, Cardiff, UK [UPDATED]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 6 Nov 2008 09:59:00 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 6 Nov 2008 09:33:54 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 6 Nov 2008 09:32:20 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Face to Face modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 6 Nov 2008 09:30:21 -0000
Agenda for SCA-J Face to Face - 11th to 13th November 2008
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 6 Nov 2008 09:28:22 -0000
Re: [sca-j] RE: Appeal of the OASIS decision on SCA-J package names
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 6 Nov 2008 06:20:54 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Timetable for each day at the SCA-J Face to Face - Workuntil 6pm?
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 5 Nov 2008 15:30:56 -0000
RE: Appeal of the OASIS decision on SCA-J package names
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 5 Nov 2008 12:35:48 -0000
RE: Appeal of the OASIS decision on SCA-J package names
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 5 Nov 2008 12:10:38 -0000
RE: Appeal of the OASIS decision on SCA-J package names
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 5 Nov 2008 11:37:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Timetable for each day at the SCA-J Face to Face - Work until6pm?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Nov 2008 10:26:07 -0000
Timetable for each day at the SCA-J Face to Face - Work until 6pm?
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 5 Nov 2008 09:44:55 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-11-03.doc uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 4 Nov 2008 18:28:22 -0000
RE: [sca-j] JAVA-53 - what happens if init() throws a runtime exception - a proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 4 Nov 2008 11:09:54 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-53 - what happens if init() throws a runtime exception - a proposal
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 3 Nov 2008 16:31:25 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java EE Spec: Need to define the derivation of the name of a component contributed to the Domain by an application.composite file [JAVA-91]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:33:14 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java EE Spec: Section 5.1.1 normative change needs ratifying [JAVA-90]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:30:11 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java EE Spec: Section 7.1.1 & 7.1.2 - should say that the EJB references are optionally made into SCA references
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:27:36 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Java EE Spec: Need to define the derivation of the name of acomponent contributed to the Domain by an application.composite file
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:12:41 -0000
JAVA-56 - When more than one interface with the same unqualified name used in the @Service annotation - a proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:12:12 -0000
JAVA-21 - Clarify Request Scope lifetime
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:12:03 -0000
JAVA-53 - what happens if init() throws a runtime exception - a proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:12:02 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Java EE Spec: Section 5.1.1 normative change needs ratifying
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:06:43 -0000
ISSUE 88: Java EE Spec: The @archive attribute of the implementation.jeeelement needs fixing
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 3 Nov 2008 14:05:01 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Java EE Spec: Section 7.1.1 & 7.1.2 - should say that the EJBreferences are optionally made into SCA references
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Nov 2008 13:55:04 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Java EE Spec: The @archive attribute of the implementation.jeeelement needs fixing
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Nov 2008 13:47:44 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2