Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-77] - Updated proposal: A remotable service SHOULDbe translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such asWSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0

[Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>]

Mark Combellack wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> JAVA-77 [1] talks about remotable services being translatable into WSDL 
> 1.1 and WSDL 2.0.
> 
>  
> 
> Recently, the Assembly TC has decided not to require WSDL 2.0 support at 
> this time (see ASSEMBLY-77 [2])
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> I would like to propose that we Close No Action JAVA-77 since this would 
> be in line with the decision of the Assembly TC.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> What do people think to this proposal?
> 
>  
I think it would be better to be explicit and say
"A remotable service can be published externally as a service and must
be translatable into a WSDL 1.1 portType"

The only change is the addition of "1.1".

   Simon

> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Mark
> 
>  
> 
> [1] http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-77
> 
> [2] http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-77
> 
> Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park | St. 
> Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | 
> mcombellack@avaya.com <mailto:|mcombellack@avaya.com>
> 
>  
>