Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated Component Type -proposal

[C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com>]

Some comments based on my review of
sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev4a-Issue27.doc:

1. Line 976: Missing dot -  ".message" instead of "message".

2. Line 977: Missing dot - ".transport" instead of "transport"

3. Line 1430: Missing dot - ".message" instead of "message".

4. Line 1431: Missing dot - ".transport" instead of "transport"

5. Remove lines 1595-1596

6. Line 1604: Correct a typo - "provides" instead of "prodies"

++Vamsi
Apache Tuscany Committer  http://tuscany.apache.org
Apache Geronimo Committer and Member of PMC  http://geronimo.apache.org



                                                                       
             Yang Lei                                                  
             <yanglei@us.ibm.c                                         
             om>                                                        To
                                       sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org      
             22/01/2009 03:41                                           cc
                                                                       
                                                                   Subject
                                       [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security     
                                       Annotations in generated Component
                                       Type - proposal                 
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       





Here is the proposal for issue 27: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-27.

The highlights of the proposal:

1. Instead of defining SCA security implementation policy annotations,
point to JSR 250  security annotations

2. Not generating componentTypes for the above annotations, due to two
major reasons:

   some of the annotations can apply onto the methods level, while
   component type definition does not have operational level any more.
   if we did generate the information into component type, we also need to
   generate the policysets to apply the policy...


3. Also added are the other annotations that is missing from section 8,
related to 10.3 Application intent annotations:

@Authentication
@Confidentiality
@Integrity
@Intent
@PolicySets
@Qualifier
@Requires

All the changes are under  8.2, 8.5, 8.15, 8.19, 8.22, 8.25, 10.6.2,
10.6.2.1.

(See attached file: sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev4a-Issue27.doc)(See
attached file: sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev4a-Issue27.pdf)


Thanks Dave for the review and comments earlier.

Regards,

Yang Lei

WebSphere SCA Feature Pack Development -- SCA Architect
Phone: (919) 543 8887  T/L  441-8887
e-mail: yanglei@us.ibm.com

SCA Feature Pack:
http://washome.austin.ibm.com/xwiki/bin/view/SCA2Team/WebHome
RTP Technical Vitality:
http://swgcomm.bluehost.ibm.com/siteFiles/labs.html?location=SEUS&type=cluster
WebSphere Lab Advocate for Royal Bank of Scotland

[attachment "sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev4a-Issue27.doc" deleted by C
Vamsi/India/IBM] [attachment "sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev4a-Issue27.pdf"
deleted by C Vamsi/India/IBM]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php