OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
244 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [sca-j] Can a reference used with constructor be optional?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 28 Feb 2009 13:56:23 -0000
Some comments on sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.doc
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 19:18:28 -0000
Can a reference used with constructor be optional?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 19:05:38 -0000
Constructor selected for implementation instance creation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 19:02:49 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 16:58:04 -0000
Raw chat log from Feb 27 SCA-J call
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 27 Feb 2009 16:41:15 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 27 Feb 2009 15:10:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 14:48:42 -0000
[ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification - PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 14:44:46 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (Word) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.doc) modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Feb 2009 14:44:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 14:43:48 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 27 Feb 2009 14:37:10 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 27 Feb 2009 14:35:16 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (Work) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Feb 2009 14:33:50 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Feb 2009 14:30:54 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 27 Feb 2009 13:55:23 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect - [JAVA-137]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 27 Feb 2009 13:53:50 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 13:43:42 -0000
[JAVA-1] Updated code proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 27 Feb 2009 13:31:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 12:52:51 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2009 11:15:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-102: Need to have a Name parameter on the @Serviceannotation
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 27 Feb 2009 10:23:55 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD03 (DOC) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd03.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 27 Feb 2009 00:55:01 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD03 (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd03.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 27 Feb 2009 00:54:16 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 26 Feb 2009 16:26:20 -0000
New Java C&I working draft 03
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2009 15:09:03 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD03 (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd03.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2009 15:02:51 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD03 (DOC) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd03.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2009 15:02:05 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA Specification CD02 - PDF Version (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2009 13:23:21 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Remove the use of componentType side files from the Java C&I specification - [JAVA-136]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 25 Feb 2009 14:52:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Feb 2009 11:14:02 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 25 Feb 2009 10:44:40 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Feb 2009 10:17:33 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Remove the use of componentType side files from the Java C&Ispecification
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Feb 2009 10:14:14 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-23 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-23.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 24 Feb 2009 10:30:10 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 24 Feb 2009 10:15:31 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Feb 2009 09:52:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter?
From
Raymond Feng <rfeng@us.ibm.com> on 23 Feb 2009 21:09:34 -0000
Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true for constructor parameter?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 23 Feb 2009 18:40:48 -0000
Review comments on sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal.doc
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 23 Feb 2009 18:19:10 -0000
Raw Chat SCA-J TC Feb 23, 2009
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 23 Feb 2009 18:10:26 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Feb 2009 16:35:25 -0000
[ISSUE 104] RFC2119 Language is needed for CAA Specification - Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Feb 2009 16:31:06 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal PDF format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2009 16:26:31 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal Word format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2009 16:24:31 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 23 Feb 2009 14:35:11 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 23 Feb 2009 13:41:05 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Problems with definition of @Service annotation - [JAVA-135]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 23 Feb 2009 13:35:26 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback and @Remotable on implementation classes - [JAVA-134]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 23 Feb 2009 13:35:23 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Problems with definition of @Service annotation
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Feb 2009 11:33:59 -0000
NEW ISSUE: @Callback and @Remotable on implementation classes
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Feb 2009 10:42:23 -0000
JAVA-98: Proposed direction for resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Feb 2009 10:33:40 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev2 PDF Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2009 10:02:14 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev2 PDF Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.pdf) modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2009 10:01:09 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-17: Proposed resolution
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Feb 2009 09:32:25 -0000
Editorial action needed: incorrect package names
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Feb 2009 08:56:17 -0000
JAVA-97: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Feb 2009 08:50:28 -0000
JAVA-74: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Feb 2009 08:38:47 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 22 Feb 2009 22:59:17 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Unannotated properties and references - [JAVA-133]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 22 Feb 2009 22:39:22 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 22 Feb 2009 20:41:37 -0000
RE: [LIKELY JUNK]AW: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO)
From
"Savchenko, Vladimir" <vladimir.savchenko@sap.com> on 22 Feb 2009 16:02:35 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Unannotated properties and references
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 22 Feb 2009 10:44:31 -0000
JAVA-17: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 22 Feb 2009 10:19:22 -0000
JAVA-13: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 22 Feb 2009 09:54:57 -0000
AW: [LIKELY JUNK]AW: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO)
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 21 Feb 2009 23:07:02 -0000
AW: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO)
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 21 Feb 2009 15:03:36 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-19 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-19.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 21 Feb 2009 00:08:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO)
From
Raymond Feng <rfeng@us.ibm.com> on 20 Feb 2009 16:50:11 -0000
Today's minutes
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 20 Feb 2009 16:14:29 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO)
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Feb 2009 14:08:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 20 Feb 2009 13:42:43 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 20 Feb 2009 13:27:40 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 20 Feb 2009 13:08:07 -0000
[JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO)
From
"Pavlov, Plamen" <plamen.pavlov@sap.com> on 20 Feb 2009 11:48:04 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 20 Feb 2009 11:44:47 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 20 Feb 2009 11:20:49 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-77] - Updated proposal: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 20 Feb 2009 11:11:24 -0000
LSC Recommendation: Removing the complexity of merging derived component types with sidefiles
From
Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com> on 19 Feb 2009 18:57:50 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2009 18:18:07 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory
From
Raymond Feng <rfeng@us.ibm.com> on 19 Feb 2009 17:13:01 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 19 Feb 2009 13:17:02 -0000
[JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 18 Feb 2009 15:50:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Feb 2009 13:55:27 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAA and C&I specifications
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Feb 2009 11:07:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAAand C&I specifications
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Feb 2009 09:58:50 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAA and C&Ispecifications
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Feb 2009 09:23:55 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAA and C&Ispecifications
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 17 Feb 2009 09:16:10 -0000
ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAA and C&I specifications
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Feb 2009 09:03:05 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-16 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-16.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 17 Feb 2009 08:50:48 -0000
Raw chat log of 2009-02-16 telcon
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 16 Feb 2009 17:03:10 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2009 16:37:34 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions -updated proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Feb 2009 15:32:11 -0000
Groups - Issue60 Version g - PDF (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd02_issue60g.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 16 Feb 2009 15:31:48 -0000
RE: [NEW ISSUE] Specification should require JDK 1.5 or above. - [JAVA-132]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 16 Feb 2009 14:36:23 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Specification should require JDK 1.5 or above.
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 16 Feb 2009 14:28:54 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Feb 2009 12:32:18 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 15 Feb 2009 21:31:35 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Feb 2009 21:24:01 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-13 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-13.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 15 Feb 2009 21:03:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 13 Feb 2009 23:46:36 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Feb 2009 23:34:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal - somethoughts
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Feb 2009 23:05:19 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal - somethoughts
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2009 20:36:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2009 20:33:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions- updated proposal
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Feb 2009 18:27:12 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Feb 2009 18:03:47 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal - somethoughts
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Feb 2009 17:47:10 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal - somethoughts
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2009 17:07:43 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 13 Feb 2009 16:11:20 -0000
Minutes 13 Feb 2009
From
Meeraj Kunnumpurath <mkunnumpurath@googlemail.com> on 13 Feb 2009 16:06:26 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Feb 2009 14:39:37 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Feb 2009 14:31:08 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Feb 2009 14:09:16 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 13 Feb 2009 13:30:19 -0000
[ISSUE 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions - updated proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2009 13:23:18 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2009 13:04:41 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 13 Feb 2009 12:42:22 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 13 Feb 2009 12:29:35 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Feb 2009 11:25:16 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Feb 2009 09:54:51 -0000
JAVA-121: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Feb 2009 23:23:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 121: Work in progress zip file
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Feb 2009 23:20:33 -0000
Groups - javacaa-code-cd02-rev2.zip uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 12 Feb 2009 23:11:38 -0000
Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.pdf) uploaded
From
yanglei@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 22:45:04 -0000
Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded
From
yanglei@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 22:43:05 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Feb 2009 14:50:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Feb 2009 14:45:01 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2009 14:39:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Feb 2009 14:39:41 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2009 13:22:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Proposed resolution for JAVA-6
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Feb 2009 13:21:58 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge2-1+Issue6-draft2.pdf uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 12 Feb 2009 13:16:17 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge2-1+Issue6-draft2.doc uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 12 Feb 2009 13:14:52 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2009 09:59:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2009 09:52:28 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 121: Work in progress zip file
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 12 Feb 2009 09:38:47 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 11 Feb 2009 21:32:07 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 11 Feb 2009 21:32:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 11 Feb 2009 19:26:23 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 11 Feb 2009 16:04:36 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 11 Feb 2009 14:59:38 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-09 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-09.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 11 Feb 2009 12:05:15 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 121: Work in progress zip file
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 10 Feb 2009 23:55:15 -0000
Groups - javacaa-code-draft2.zip uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 10 Feb 2009 23:51:28 -0000
JAVA-76: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 10 Feb 2009 20:43:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-131: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 10 Feb 2009 16:10:38 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 10 Feb 2009 15:55:07 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-131: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 10 Feb 2009 15:48:16 -0000
ISSUE-131: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 10 Feb 2009 15:26:45 -0000
NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 10 Feb 2009 15:10:00 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-125: proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 10 Feb 2009 14:04:21 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-125: proposed resolution
From
Graham Charters <CHARTERS@uk.ibm.com> on 10 Feb 2009 13:06:26 -0000
ISSUE 121: Work in progress zip file
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 9 Feb 2009 23:42:27 -0000
Groups - javacaa-code-draft1.zip uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 9 Feb 2009 23:38:43 -0000
Groups - javacaa-code-draft1.zip uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 9 Feb 2009 23:10:59 -0000
Raw Text from SCA-J TC conf call, 9th Feb 2009
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 9 Feb 2009 17:03:16 -0000
ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:56:41 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 2b in chapter 7 - [JAVA-129]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:49:59 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: alternate proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:42:59 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:38:06 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-46: Proposal for ServiceReference equals() method
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:31:27 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 2b in chapter 7
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:23:32 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:22:40 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 2b in chapter 7
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:07:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-125: proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 9 Feb 2009 14:49:59 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Action Item 2008-11-11-7: Propose a delta on JAVA-25for message correlation on callbacks
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 9 Feb 2009 14:39:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: alternate proposal
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 9 Feb 2009 13:47:03 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 9 Feb 2009 12:18:38 -0000
JAVA-125: proposed resolution
From
Graham Charters <CHARTERS@uk.ibm.com> on 9 Feb 2009 11:53:30 -0000
JAVA-46: Proposal for ServiceReference equals() method
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 9 Feb 2009 11:37:14 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Proposed resolution for JAVA-6
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 9 Feb 2009 10:32:50 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1 Merge2-1 Issue6_mje.doc (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1 Merge2-1 Issue6_mje.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 9 Feb 2009 10:29:12 -0000
Action Item 2008-11-11-7: Propose a delta on JAVA-25 for message correlation on callbacks
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 9 Feb 2009 09:44:53 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev1 PDF Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 8 Feb 2009 19:57:28 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev2 Word Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 8 Feb 2009 19:56:27 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Feb 2009 15:31:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Feb 2009 10:43:17 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 7 Feb 2009 06:52:22 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - February 2009 (SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - 2009-02-02, 03 and 06.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 6 Feb 2009 22:03:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week?
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 6 Feb 2009 21:03:24 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 6 Feb 2009 20:43:53 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week?
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 6 Feb 2009 19:21:09 -0000
Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 27 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge+Issue27.pdf) uploaded
From
yanglei@us.ibm.com on 6 Feb 2009 19:18:52 -0000
Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 27 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge+Issue27.doc) uploaded
From
yanglei@us.ibm.com on 6 Feb 2009 19:14:52 -0000
[sca-j] Java TC raw minutes Feb 6th 2009
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 6 Feb 2009 18:15:56 -0000
Will we be needing another V F2F next week?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 6 Feb 2009 18:09:29 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge PolicyAnnotationMaterial with rest of spec - Version #3
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 6 Feb 2009 15:22:20 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev1+Merge3 Word Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge3.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 6 Feb 2009 15:20:18 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 6 Feb 2009 13:38:04 -0000
Proposed resolution for JAVA-6
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 6 Feb 2009 13:25:10 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge2-1+Issue6.doc uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 6 Feb 2009 13:21:05 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 6 Feb 2009 12:33:31 -0000
JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 6 Feb 2009 10:48:17 -0000
Issue 119: alternate proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 6 Feb 2009 08:02:15 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec -- Issue 27
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 5 Feb 2009 09:52:22 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 5 Feb 2009 09:39:33 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - Days 1 and 2 - 2nd and 3rd February 2009 (SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - Days 1and 2 - 2009-02-02 and 03.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Feb 2009 09:39:46 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec -- Issue 27
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 3 Feb 2009 22:18:35 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 3 Feb 2009 20:28:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec -- Issue 27
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 3 Feb 2009 20:18:54 -0000
VF2F Day 2 raw chat log, and xml attachement
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 3 Feb 2009 18:39:09 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 3 Feb 2009 18:33:25 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Feb 2009 18:02:03 -0000
[Issue 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions - Updated proposal #2
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Feb 2009 15:42:37 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-6: Proposed direction
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 3 Feb 2009 15:28:24 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-6: Proposed direction
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Feb 2009 14:43:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 3 Feb 2009 14:36:53 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 3 Feb 2009 13:54:53 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Which scopes must implementations support? [JAVA-128]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Feb 2009 13:51:14 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Which scopes must implementations support?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 3 Feb 2009 13:45:57 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 13:36:51 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 13:18:45 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Which scopes must implementations support? [JAVA-128]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Feb 2009 13:17:36 -0000
Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy Annotation Material with restof spec
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Feb 2009 13:10:45 -0000
Which scopes must implementations support?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 3 Feb 2009 13:01:38 -0000
JAVA-6: Proposed direction
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 3 Feb 2009 11:30:15 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - Day 1 - 2009-02-02 (SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - Day 1 - 2009-02-02.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 3 Feb 2009 11:09:40 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Long running request/response operations
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 3 Feb 2009 10:47:56 -0000
CD02 Rev1 of Java CAA spec available
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Feb 2009 10:46:16 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev1 Word Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 10:40:43 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev1 PDF Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 10:39:36 -0000
ISSUE 119: COnformance
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 2 Feb 2009 20:24:19 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Long running request/response operations
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 2 Feb 2009 18:43:23 -0000
Raw chat log from SCA-J virtual F2F session on 02/02/2009
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Feb 2009 18:34:41 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 2 Feb 2009 16:27:53 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated Component Type -proposal comments
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Feb 2009 15:37:33 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated Component Type -proposal comments
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 2 Feb 2009 15:32:55 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 2 Feb 2009 15:27:35 -0000
[ISSUE 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions - Updated proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Feb 2009 15:22:36 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 2 Feb 2009 15:18:12 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 2 Feb 2009 15:13:38 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated ComponentType - proposal comments
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Feb 2009 15:09:07 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 2 Feb 2009 14:59:12 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 2 Feb 2009 14:33:15 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 2 Feb 2009 14:21:57 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated Component Type -proposal comments
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Feb 2009 14:14:10 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 2 Feb 2009 13:08:27 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 2 Feb 2009 13:01:55 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 2 Feb 2009 13:01:03 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) added
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 2 Feb 2009 13:00:07 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 2 Feb 2009 12:58:10 -0000
Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 2 Feb 2009 12:50:01 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-01-30 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-01-30.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 2 Feb 2009 10:32:38 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2