[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 4
Hi, Based on the comments in the conference
call, I have produced version 4 of the specification. To simplify identifying the changes, I
have highlighted them in yellow. Thanks, Mark Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | From:
Mark Combellack [mailto:mcombellack@avaya.com] Hi, Following on from Simons comments in [1],
I have updated the proposal by using Simon’s proposed wording changes.
This new version is attached as version 3. Thanks, Mark [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200903/msg00061.html Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | From:
Mark Combellack [mailto:mcombellack@avaya.com] Hi, As discussed in our conference calls, I have updated the proposal
for JAVA-65 to remove the PostInit and PreDestroy phases to simplify the model.
The attached document contains the revised proposal All changes for Issue 65 are contained in a new chapter 4. The changes between this new revision 2 and the original
proposal are:
This update completes my action 2009-02-19-02. Thanks, Mark Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | |
sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2_plus_Issue 65-rev4.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]