Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification- updated draft

[Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>]

Mike,
A few comments on this draft:

1. Line 133: wrong font for namespace.

2. Lines 250/251: change "can also be" to "are".

3. Lines 484-487: Conformance statement JCI80002 is worded incorrectly
    because it doesn't say that the error only applies when both
    setters are for a property or both setters are for a reference.
    Suggested words: If a Java implementation class, with or without
    @Property and @Reference annotations, has more than one setter method
    with the same JavaBeans property name [JAVABEANS] and these setter
    methods either both correspond to SCA properties or both correspond
    to SCA references, the SCA runtime MUST raise an error and MUST NOT
    instantiate the implementation class.

4. Lines 612/613: make SCA runtime the conformance target of JCI100002.
    Suggested words: The SCA runtime MUST ensure that the package used to
    satisfy an import matches the package name, the version number or
    version number range and (if present) the location specified on the
    import.java element.

5. Lines 630-632: make SCA runtime the conformance target of JCI100003.
    Suggested words: The uses directive indicates that the SCA runtime
    MUST ensure that any SCA contribution that imports this package from this
    exporting contribution also imports the same version as is used by this
    exporting contribution of any of the packages contained in the uses directive.

6. Lines 665/666: make SCA runtime the conformance target of JCI100008.
    Suggested words: The SCA runtime MUST ensure that within a contribution,
    Java classes are resolved according to the following steps in the order
    specified:

7. Lines 681-683: Reword the first sentence as normative.  Suggested words:
    The SCA runtime MUST ensure that the Java classes used by a contribution
    are all loaded by by a class loader that is unique for each contribution
    in the Domain.

   Simon

Mike Edwards wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Following today's discussion, an updated draft:
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/31719/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal3.pdf 
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/31718/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal3.doc 
> 
> 
> Yours,  Mike.
> 
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
> Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> /
> /
> 
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>