OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-j message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification -updated draft


Simon,

For No.3 - Lines 484-487, I suggest the following text:

If a Java implementation class, with or without @Property and @Reference
annotations, has more than one setter method with the same JavaBeans
property name [JAVABEANS] corresponding to the setter method name, all of
which result in either an SCA property or an SCA reference, the SCA runtime
MUST raise an error and MUST NOT instantiate the implementation class.


++Vamsi



                                                                           
             Simon Nash                                                    
             <oasis@cjnash.com                                             
             >                                                          To 
                                       OASIS Java                          
             18/03/2009 04:17          <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>        
                                                                        cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119     
                                       Language is needed for C&I          
                                       Specification - updated draft       
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           



Mike,
A few comments on this draft:

1. Line 133: wrong font for namespace.

2. Lines 250/251: change "can also be" to "are".

3. Lines 484-487: Conformance statement JCI80002 is worded incorrectly
    because it doesn't say that the error only applies when both
    setters are for a property or both setters are for a reference.
    Suggested words: If a Java implementation class, with or without
    @Property and @Reference annotations, has more than one setter method
    with the same JavaBeans property name [JAVABEANS] and these setter
    methods either both correspond to SCA properties or both correspond
    to SCA references, the SCA runtime MUST raise an error and MUST NOT
    instantiate the implementation class.

4. Lines 612/613: make SCA runtime the conformance target of JCI100002.
    Suggested words: The SCA runtime MUST ensure that the package used to
    satisfy an import matches the package name, the version number or
    version number range and (if present) the location specified on the
    import.java element.

5. Lines 630-632: make SCA runtime the conformance target of JCI100003.
    Suggested words: The uses directive indicates that the SCA runtime
    MUST ensure that any SCA contribution that imports this package from
    this
    exporting contribution also imports the same version as is used by this
    exporting contribution of any of the packages contained in the uses
    directive.

6. Lines 665/666: make SCA runtime the conformance target of JCI100008.
    Suggested words: The SCA runtime MUST ensure that within a
    contribution,
    Java classes are resolved according to the following steps in the order
    specified:

7. Lines 681-683: Reword the first sentence as normative.  Suggested words:
    The SCA runtime MUST ensure that the Java classes used by a
    contribution
    are all loaded by by a class loader that is unique for each
    contribution
    in the Domain.

   Simon

Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Following today's discussion, an updated draft:
>
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/31719/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal3.pdf

>
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/31718/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal3.doc

>
>
> Yours,  Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]