[NEW ISSUE] Section 10.13 on @OneWay requires a normative statement

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

*** NB I am happy for this new issue
to be treated as a comment on the Public Review draft - I just don't want
this item lost ***

Raiser:        
       Mike Edwards

Target:        
       sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev6.doc

Description:

There is a sentence in section 10.13
about @OneWay which in effect describes a normative requirement but is
not in the
form of a normative statement:

Lines 1923 - 1925:

"The
@OneWay annotation is used on a Java interface or class method to indicate
that invocations will be dispatched 
in a non-blocking fashion as described
in the section on Asynchronous Programming."

This must be recast into the form of
a normative statement

Proposal:

Replace lines 1923 - 1925 with the following
normative statement:

When a Java interface method or a Java
class method is annotated with @OneWay, the SCA runtime MUST ensure that
all
invocations of that method are executed
in a non-blocking fashion, as described in the section on Asynchonous Programming.
[JCA90052]


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU