[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] JAVA-153: Updated proposed resolution
I am in favor of this proposal and the accompanying proposal for 125.
However, lines 158-163 seem to conflict. 158-160 says that unless there is an @Remotable annotation, the service is local. But lines 161-163 introduce another possibility for defining a remotable service.
I think we may have discussed this in the last call, but don't remember what we decided to do about it.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
Simon Nash ---06/08/2009 06:53:37 AM---I am attaching an update to the proposed resolution for JAVA-153, incorporating the changes agreed o
From: | Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> |
To: | OASIS Java <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org> |
Date: | 06/08/2009 06:53 AM |
Subject: | [sca-j] JAVA-153: Updated proposed resolution |
sca-javaci-1.1-spec-cd01+issue153-rev2.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]