Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and<operationSelection/> - proposal v3

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

I don't see any reason to be punitive and take away this extensibility point. And further, IIRC, the JEE specs allow for any wire level transport protocol (and by extension message format) when interacting with EJBs.

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

Anish Karmarkar ---06/12/2009 02:46:39 AM---Seems like a good way to resolve this. One question I do have is: do we still want to allow this (as

From:	Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
To:	David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	06/12/2009 02:46 AM
Subject:	Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v3

---

Seems like a good way to resolve this.

One question I do have is: do we still want to allow this (as an 
extension point) or disallow it in this binding?

-Anish
--

David Booz wrote:
> If we agree to go this route, the EJB binding spec might look different 
> than the current proposal. I would throw away the current proposal and 
> simply add a new section before the Appendix, like this:
> 
> 7 Wire Format and Operation Selectors
> 
> The SCA Assembly Model Specification [ASSEMBLY] defines extensibility 
> points for bindings to specify <wireFormat/> and <operationSelector/> 
> configuration. This specification does not define any wire format or 
> operation selector extension elements.
> 
> 
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
> 
> Inactive hide details for Mike Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:09 
> AM---Folks, I wonder why we need a description of these 2 elementMike 
> Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:09 AM---Folks, I wonder why we need a 
> description of these 2 elements in this binding,
> 
> 
> From:		 
> Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
> 
> To:		 
> "OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> Date:		 
> 06/11/2009 02:53 AM
> 
> Subject:		 
> Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> 
> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v2
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I wonder why we need a description of these 2 elements in this binding, 
> given that it does not actually support them.
> 
> I note that the issue has been raised in Assembly to make the elements 
> abstract, so that in reality only specific extended
> forms of these elements can be used anywhere - and this spec states that 
> it does not support any of them.
> 
> 
> Yours, Mike.
> 
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
> 
> From: 		 David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
> To: 		 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
> Date: 		 10/06/2009 15:22
> Subject: 		 [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for 
> <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v2
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> There was a small editorial change to this proposal noted in the 
> telecon. I am reposting v2 of the proposal just for that change. I 
> believe we are blocked on this issue until Anish raises the binding 
> issue to address wireFormat and OperationSelector in the pseudo schema 
> of the WS binding spec./
> 
> (See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc)/
> 
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com[attachment 
> "sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc" deleted by Mike 
> Edwards/UK/IBM] 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:_
> __https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php_ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /
> /
> 
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php