sca-j message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [NEW ISSUE] Normative statement JCA90052 is poorly worded
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:31:46 +0100
Raiser:
Mike
Edwards
Target:
sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd03.pdf
Description:
JCA90052 is worded as follows:
The @AllowsPassByReference annotation
MAY be placed on an individual method of a remotable
service implementation, on a service
implementation class, or on an individual reference for a
remotable service. When applied to a
reference, it MAY appear anywhere that the @Remotable
annotation MAY appear. It MUST NOT appear
anywhere else.
The existence of three MAY words followed
by a MUST NOT is at best confusing. It leads to an assumption
that @AllowsPassByReference is an optional
feature, which is not intended.
This confusing formulation should be
replaced by clearer wording that avoids the impression of optionality.
Proposal:
The @AllowsPassByReference annotation
MUST only annotate the following locations:
- a service implementation class
- an individual method of a remotable
service implementation
- an individual reference which uses
a remotable interface, where the @AllowsPassByReference annotation
can annotate any artifact which can
be annotated by the @Remotable annotation
[JCA90052]
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]