[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] JAVA-153: Proposed resolution rev3
David Booz wrote: > one comment below > > (cut) > > > > > > > I'm merely pointing out that ISSUE-125 is still not completely correct. > > > > > This small clarification to existing text was overlooked when we resolved > > JAVA-125. This language is non-normative and I would have thought that > > the change could be handled editorially. If as chair you think that a > > formal resolution is needed to add these few words of clarification, > I will > > propose reopening JAVA-125 so that these words can we added to the > sentence > > in chapter 3. > > Formality takes more work but it ensures that everyone is aware of > important changes in the document. I think we need an issue for this (or > re-opening 125). > I'm happy to follow this procedure, and I have sent an email requesting that JAVA-125 be reopened. Simon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]