Raw Text from SCA-J Conf call

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

Here is the raw text of the meeting
of 19th June:

- Roll Call
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=sca-j
- Appointment of scribe. List attached
below
- Agenda bashing
- Approval of minutes for 15th June
2009
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32939/SCA%20Java%20Minutes%202009-06-15.doc


0. Administration 
- Issue Status: Open: 28
- SCA-J Public Review
    Started: 8th June 2009
    Ends:    7th
August 2009


1. Review action items:

Action Items that I believe are done:

Action Items that I believe are still
to be done:
2008-11-11-22: Mark to draw up some
wording for Direction 1 (as discussed at the November F2F) for JAVA-62
2008-11-11-23: Mark (and others prepared
to help) to investigate the WorkManager JEE spec and determine its applicability
to SCA for JAVA-62
2009-05-11-01: Editors: remove extra
space on line 767 of CD01 (PDF)
2009-06-01-01: MikeE to raise issue
regarding some Assembly tests that require Java
2009-06-05-02: Anish to raise an issue
in Bindings TC against WS binding spec to address wireFormat and operationSelector
pseudo-schema once the Assembly change is made to make these abstract.


2. New Issues

None


3. Open Issues

a. JAVA-140: Schema for @ejb-link-name
is incorrect
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-140
Updated proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html

b. JAVA-149: SCA Spring C & I specification
need to specify the limitations of implicit references
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-149
Proposal in Jira

c. JAVA-150: SCA Spring C & I specification
need to mention how SCA runtime should load multiple application context
files.
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-150
Proposal in Jira

d. JAVA-114: Spring CI runtime behaviour
when annotation rules are violated
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-114
Proposal in Jira

e. JAVA-24: The EJB bindings specification
should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-24
Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00049.html

f. JAVA-122: EJB Binding - Remove references
to conversational function
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-122
Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00050.html

g. JAVA-118: EJB Binding: Need description
for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/>
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-118
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00027.html
Waiting for Assembly and Binding issues
to be raised and resolved
Latest proposal 1: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00051.html
Latest proposal 2: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00056.html

h. JAVA-58: SCA Spring C&I Specification
does not have a normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType
of a Spring Application context
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-58
Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00107.html
PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33005/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.pdf

MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33004/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.doc


i JAVA-164: Spring C&I SCA extension
element does not provide full functionality possible in an SCA CT
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-164
Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00111.html
PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33007/sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01%2BIssue164.pdf
MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33006/sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01%20Issue164.doc



4. Issues waiting for updated proposals

a. JAVA-59: SCA Spring C & I specification
does not state what happens when a Bean exposed as a service implements
mutliple interfaces
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-59
Waiting for updated proposal

b. JAVA-92: Spring C&I spec needs
to define how effective CT is calculated
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-92
Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200905/msg00102.html
Waiting for JAVA-58 to be resolved.


5. Issues with no proposals

a. JAVA-163: Spring C&I sca-spring:reference
element has a default attribute which is unexplained
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-163
No proposal

b. JAVA-107: RFC2119 Language is needed
for the EJB Binding Specification
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-107
No proposal

c. JAVA-106: RFC2119 Language is needed
for Spring C&I Specification
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-106
No proposal

d. JAVA-63: SCA Spring C & I specification
does not state whether Constructor Injection should be supported
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-63
No proposal


6. AOB

a. Straggler roll call


---------------------------------------------------------------
Rotating scribe list:

Ron Barack SAP AG (3)
Michael Beisiegel IBM (3)
Sanjay Patil SAP AG (3)
Jim Marino Individual (4)
Pradeep Simha TIBCO Software Inc. (5)
Vamsavardhana Chillakuru IBM (3)
Plamen Pavlov SAP AG (2)
Meeraj Kunnumpurath Individual (3)
Martin Chapman Oracle Corporation (9)
Yang Lei (7)
Mike Edwards IBM (10)
Graham Charters IBM (3)
Anish Karmarkar Oracle Corporation (12)
Ashok Malhotra Oracle Corporation (11)
Bryan Aupperle IBM (12)
Yang Lei (8 )
Simon Nash Individual (9)
anonymous morphed into anish
Scribe: Mike Edwards
Agenda Bashin
No changes
Item 1 Meeting Minutes
Minutes for 15th June
RESOLUTION: Minutes are approved without
objection

Item 2 TC Admin
28 open issues
Public review has started for Java CAA,
Java CI specs
Ends 7th August

Item 3 Action Items
No progress on any action items - all
remain pending

Item 4 New Issues
No new issues

Item 5 Open Issues
a. JAVA-140: Schema for @ejb-link-name
is incorrect
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-140
Updated proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html
Anish: the only issue is whether it
should be string or anyURI

Bryan moves to resolve Issue 140 using
the proposal in the email http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html
Mike Edwards seconds
Anish: Should this be anyURI rather
than string?
Mike E: This was debated on the email
list as Dave started with anyURI but changed it as a result of previous
discussions
Bryan: Could there be a circumstance
where the pointer to the JAR would not follow normal URI schemes?
Motion passes unanimously
RESOLUTION: Issue 140 is resolved

JAVA-149: SCA Spring C & I specification
need to specify the limitations of implicit references
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-149
Proposal in Jira
Mike E presents the proposal
Anish: The proposal is quite vague -
it isn't spec language
ACTION 20090619-01: Mike E to prepare
a detailed proposal for Issue 149

JAVA-150: SCA Spring C & I specification
need to mention how SCA runtime should load multiple application context
files.
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-150
Proposal in Jira
Need to get Ram on a call to present
this one

JAVA-114: Spring CI runtime behaviour
when annotation rules are violated
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-114
Proposal in Jira
Discussion of the fact that currently,
there is nothing in the spec that says that SCA annotations are supported

- and that a discussion on the componentType
calculation indicated that an issue needs raising to add support for SCA
annotations to the Spring spec

JAVA-24: The EJB bindings specification
should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-24
Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00049.html
Anish outlines the proposal
Mark Combellack: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00068.html
Anish moves to resolve Issue 24 with
the proposal contained in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00068.html
Mark Combellack: Motion seconded by
Bryan
Motion passes unanimously
RESOLUTION: Issue 24 is resolved

Issue 58: SCA Spring C&I Specification
does not have a normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType
of a Spring Application context
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-58
Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00107.html
PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33005/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.pdf

MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33004/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.doc

Mike E presents the proposal
Anish I'm in the same boat as dave wrt
reference calculation
Anish - would like to see all implicit
references overridden if a <sca:reference/> is declared
COB

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU