sca-j message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification should mention how implicitservices should be determined for special bean definitions
- From: Ramkumar R1 <ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com>
- To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:52:32 +0530
Raiser: Ramkumar Ramalingam
Target: sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02.pdf
Description:
The SCA Spring Client and Implementation specification should mention how
implicit services should be determined for the following bean definition
as shown below.
Scenario 1:
<bean id="bean1" class="calculator.calculatorImpl"
abstract="true">
....
....
</bean>
Scenario 2:
<bean id="bean1" parent="calculator.calculatorImp">
....
....
</bean>
Scenario 3:
<bean id="bean1" factory-bean="calculator.CalculatorFactory">
....
....
</bean>
The current specs says that in case of
implicit services, if there are no <sca:service/> elements in the
application context, then services are defined by each of the top-level
<bean/> elements in the application context. For the following scenarios
shown above, its not valid to create a service.
Proposal:
The specification should state that, for
these scenarios the services will not be defined and these beans will be
ignored for exposing as service.
Thanks & Regards,
R Ramkumar
Open Source SOA Development - Apache Tuscany
Phone : 91-80-41927623
Email : ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]