Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Proposal

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Thanks Mike.
Two comments:
1) Any particular reason not to reference the latest spring release 
(2.5.x) rather than 2.0.x?
2) I would like to suggest that the last stmt in section 5.1 be changed 
from:

Such an SCA Spring Component Implementation Composite Document MUST be a 
conformant SCA Composite Document, as defined by [ASSEMBLY], and MUST 
comply with the requirements specified in Section 5 of this specification.

to:

Such an SCA Spring Component Implementation Composite Document MUST be a 
conformant SCA Composite Document, as defined by [ASSEMBLY], and MUST 
comply with >>>additional constraints on the document content as defined 
in Appendix B.<<<

I'm using the language from the assembly spec. Section 5 doesn't specify 
any requirements for the composite document, but section 2 does (I 
suspect you meant to say section 2 and not 5).

-Anish
--

PS: I'm at a f2f this week and may not be able to attend the call today.

Mike Edwards wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I've created a proposal for Issue 106 here:
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33534/sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02%2BIssue106.pdf 
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33533/sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02%2BIssue106.doc 
> 
> 
> Comments welcome
> 
> Yours,  Mike.
> 
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
> Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> /
> /
> 
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>