ISSUE 107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB Binding Specification -proposal v3

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

Following Mike's review of the Issue 107 progress to date, I have another revision (v3) for 107 ready for review.

Mike, there are a couple of your comments that I'd like to talk to you about (still in the document).

1) Comment attached to section 3 ("Layout of section 3 is confusing...". I restructured this section and re-worded things slightly, guessing at your concerns, but am not really sure I understand your comment. Please take a look at what I've done and let me know if I addressed the comment or not.

2) Comment attached to section 3.1 - I'd like to strike the sentence you highlighted in your comment. Would that resolve the concern, or is there still a concern?

I removed your comments where I was nearly certain that I had addressed it.

I know about the formatting problem is section 8 of the pdf document, I'll correct that on the next iteration. I found it after I had already uploaded the documents.

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/33580/sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04%20issue107_v3.pdf
[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/33579/sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04%20issue107_v3.doc


Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com