Re: [sca-j] AI 2009-09-28-05 - unstated prereqs for JCI-TA-8005/8006

["Combellack, Mark (Mark)" <MCOMBELLACK@avaya.com>]

Title: Re: [sca-j] AI 2009-09-28-05 - unstated prereqs for JCI-TA-8005/8006

Hi Dave,

Thanks for the updated wording for this action item. I have applied it
to the updated POJO Test Assertions document that I am working on.

I'll also mark the action item as done for the agenda on Monday.

Mark

David Booz wrote:
> The last time we reviewed the POJO TA document, there was one action left
> undone which I'd like to try to cleanup now.  Mark, since you have the pen
> for this document, I'll just include my suggested changes in this email and
> you can include them in the text when you take your pass over the document
> this week.
>
> JCI-TA-8005 and 8006 are assertions for normative statement JCI80001, which
> is the monsterously large normative statement that defines the
> componentType introspection rules.  I believe that the missing unstated
> pre-reqs are:
>
> JCI-TA-8005 - prereqs do not include the fact that there must also be zero
> @Property and zero @Reference annotations.
>
> JCI-TA-8006 - I'm not sure what's wrong with the prereqs on this TA.  Looks
> ok to me.
>
> This completes my AI 2009-09-28-05
>
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>