Re: [sca-j] WD10 zip file

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Anish,

No problem with the new WD10 and the
re-approval.

As for the new subdirectories
- I'm OK with the subdirectory for springci,

- but to have a further subdirectory
for each csd seems overkill.

We are switching from having one directory
with a lot of files to the opposite extreme of lots and lots of directories
each
with very few files.  The redundancy
of the directory names and the names of the files bothers me in this respect.


Yours, Mike

Dr Mike Edwards		Mail Point 137, Hursley Park
STSM		Winchester, Hants SO21 2JN
SCA & Services Standards		United Kingdom
Co-Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC
IBM Software Group
Phone:	+44-1962 818014
Mobile:	+44-7802-467431 (274097)
e-mail:	mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
To:	OASIS Java <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	20/05/2011 23:42
Subject:	[sca-j] WD10 zip file

---

Hi,

We approved WD09 as our CSD01 for Spring CI. The TC admin found a few 
issues with it:

1) We approved the doc file, but we need to submit the doc file as well
as the XSD. It is best to get approval on the zip file that contain both.
2) Since we approved the doc file, I had to create the zip file after 
the fact and therefore the timestamps on the doc file in the zip is 
different from the one we approved.
3) The name of the xsd file in the appendix was sca-spring-extension.xsd
and if we are to stay inline with the SCA naming convention (eg SCA 
BPEL) that we have adopted, it should be sca-spring-extensions.xsd (plural).
4) We agreed to move to the new OASIS naming guidelines, therefore there
needs to be a "v" in the name of the file before the version
number.

I have fixed all the problems and created a WD10 zip file [1]. We should
approve the new WD10 as CSD01. If the TC blesses it, I'll update the 
issues for creating CSD01 and PR01 with the new zip file.

This assumes that the file name is sca-springci-v1.1-WD10. The other 
option is sca-springci-spec-v1.1-WD10. We do use 'spec' in other SCA 
specs, but I find it to be redundant (what else could it be other than
a 
spec?). Since we are moving away from old naming convention, I thought
it was a good time to remove the 'spec' part. But if the TC decides to
keep the 'spec' part we can change this.

The other thing that we ought to discuss is creating subdirectories 
under docs.oasis-open.org for our specs/XSD/jar files. Because of the 
large number of specs and various CD/CSDs that this TC has to deal with,
as Robin had mentioned some time ago, it is increasingly getting messy.
Robin had suggested (and the new TC Admin Paul Knight has as well) 
creating a 'springci' or a 'springci-spec' subdirectory. We also have to
figure out whether we want the subdirectory under 'opencsa' or not. So
there are four options for the URLs:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-v1.1-csd01.doc

or

http://docs.oasis-open.org/sca-j/sca-springci-spec/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-spec-v1.1-csd01.doc

or

http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-v1.1-csd01.doc

or

http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci-spec/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-spec-v1.1-csd01.doc

I like the third option the best. But we need to decide on this. I'll 
put all of this on the agenda for monday.

Thanks.

-Anish
--

[1] 
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42243/sca-springci-v1.1-WD10.zip

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU