meeting minutes - June 6, 2011

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

[11:03] Mike Edwards: 1. Roll call

2. Scribe appointment
Scribe list attached below

3. Agenda bashing

4. Meeting Minutes
Minutes of 2011-05-23 telcon:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/201105/msg00042.html

5. TC Administrivia
a. Recording issue status - 8 open, 0 new

6. ACTION ITEMS
2011-05-09-2: Mike to fix editorial problems with the TC document & make proposal for Issue 238
PENDING

2011-05-23-1: Anish to send a request to the SCA-Assembly TC wrt updating the RDDL and the XSD for spring CI
PENDING

7. Planning for PR of various specs
a) CAA spec: apply issue 233
b) CAA TA: apply issue 235, apply issue 232
c) CAA TC: apply issues 215? & 234
d) POJO spec: apply issue 231
e) POJO TA: apply issue 236
f) POJO TC: apply issue 222, ref udpate(?)
g) Spring: DONE
h) Spring TC: WD01 ready, need edits to remove JMS-isms + issue 238

8. CSD01 issues
a) What should the subdirectory be named?
opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1 OR opencsa/sca-j/springci/v1.1 ?

9. New Issues (requires 2/3)
NONE

10. Issues with proposals
NONE

11. Issues waiting for updated proposals (Spring/EJB/JEE)
a. Issue 238 TA and TC needed for SPR30005
http://osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-238
Awating proposal from Mike

b. Issue 239 JCI90003 -- Java SE 5 requirement should be on the runtime not on the class
http://osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-239
Consensus is to allow versions higher than 5. What is the minimum? 5 or 6? How easy is it to run our tests with version 5? Awating action from Mike.

c. JAVA-109: Property and reference names computed from SCA annotations in web modules not specified explicitly
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-109
Proposal in Jira
Waiting for updated proposal (Vamsi)

d. JAVA-174: Consider portlets in the SCA JEE specification
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-174

e. JAVA-91: Java EE Spec: Need to define the derivation of the name of a component contributed to the Domain by an application.composite file
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-91
Waiting for updated proposal (Mike)

f. JAVA-93: JEE Integration spec needs to define how effective CT is calculated
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-93
Waiting for updated proposal (Anish)

g. JAVA-108: RFC2119 Language is needed for the SCA-JEE Specification
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-108
Waiting for updated proposal

h. JAVA-88: Java EE Spec: The @archive attribute of the implementation.jee element needs fixing
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-88
No proposal
Plamen to check whether on his informal JEE issues list

12. AOB
a. straggler role

13. Spec status

CAA (part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs):
2 new issue, 2nd PR ended 2010-12-08, CSD05 expected to be final CSD
1st impl: Tuscany (compliant), 2nd impl: ??
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/201012/msg00000.htmlhttp://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/201012/msg00000.htmlTA: CD01 PR ended 2010-10-24, 0 open issue, CSD02 expected to be final CSD
TC: CD01 PR ended 2010-10-24, 0 open issue, CSD02 expected to be final CSD

POJO (part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs):
0 open issues, 2st PR ended 2010-12-08, CSD03 expected to be final CSD
1st impl: Tuscany (compliant), 2nd impl: ??
TA: CSD01 PR ended 2010-12-23
TC: CDS01 PR ended 2010-12-23

EJB Binding (not part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs):
0 open issues, 1st PR done, CSD03 expected to be final CSD
1st impl: ??, 2nd impl: ??
TA: WD stage, no CSD yet, 60 day PR needed
TC: WD stage, no CSD yet, 60 day PR needed

Spring C&I (not part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs):
1st CSD undergoing 30 day PR
1st impl: ??, 2nd impl: ??
TA/TC: WD01 available

JEE (not part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs):
6 open issues, WD stage (not actively worked on), no CSD yet, 60 day PR needed
1st impl: ??, 2nd impl: ??
TA: no work done
TC: no work done

[11:04] anish: Date: 2011-06-06

[11:05] anish: Scribe: Dave Booz

[11:06] Dave Booz: scribe: Dave Booz

[11:06] Dave Booz: topic: agenda bashing

[11:07] Dave Booz: no changes to posted agenda

[11:07] Dave Booz: topic: meeting mins approval

[11:08] Dave Booz: mins approved without changes

[11:13] Dave Booz: topic: administrivia

[11:14] Dave Booz: discussion on URL names for the spring CI spec - we're adhering to the new naming guidelines for this spec

[11:16] Dave Booz: the only thing we get to pick in the URL is the abbreviation of the work product

[11:16] Dave Booz: topic: AI

[11:18] Dave Booz: all AIs are still pending

[11:19] Dave Booz: meeting is quorate with 4 of 6 voting members

[11:20] Dave Booz: topic: Issues

[11:21] Dave Booz: Issue 238 TA and TC needed for SPR30005
http://osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-238

[11:21] Dave Booz: Mike still working on this

[11:21] Dave Booz: Issue 239 JCI90003 -- Java SE 5 requirement should be on the runtime not on the class
http://osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-239

[11:24] Dave Booz: Mike - default run scripts in test suite are depending on java 6 - but these scripts are not normative nor required to be used

[11:26] Dave Booz: Anish - we should stick to Java5 as a minimum

[11:26] Dave Booz: Mike - need to change text if we want to allow higher than 5 and we need to change the target of the conformance to the runtime, not the app class

[11:28] Dave Booz: Anish - let's work on the text now to resolve this

[11:28] anish: The Java class referenced by the @class attribute of <implementation.java/> MUST conform to Java SE version 5.0. [JCI90003]

[11:31] Dave Booz: Mike - does this req. even need to be stated given CAA requirements

[11:31] Dave Booz: Anish - would like at least some simple statement, even if it's not a compliance stmt

[11:36] anish: As a result of the requirements above the SCA Runtime has to be based on Java SE 5 or above

[11:37] anish: For information, as a result of the requirements above the SCA Runtime has to be based on Java SE 5 or above

[11:38] anish: and remove JCI90003 from the main spec and TC docment

[11:39] Mike Edwards: Mike moves to resolve issue 239 by a) removing JCI90003 from the main spec and from the TestCases document and b) adding the following text as a new paragraph at the end of section 11.3: "For information, as a result of the requirements above the SCA Runtime has to be based on Java SE 5 or above."

[11:40] Dave Booz: seconded by Dave

[11:41] Dave Booz: resolution: motion passes without objection to resolve JAVA-239

[11:43] Dave Booz: ACTION: Mike - update the POJO work products with remaining resolved issues

[11:44] Dave Booz: ACTION: All - Examine CAA spec for optional aspects

[11:44] Dave Booz: topic: closing

[11:45] Dave Booz: no stragglers

[11:45] Dave Booz: meeting adjourned

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com