Hi folks,
The link for this issue in the SCA Policy
TC JIRA: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-24
Regards,
Kaanu Joshi
From: David Booz
[mailto:booz@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007
12:37 AM
To:
sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [sca-policy] NEW ISSUE:
More direct, structural qualifier definition
TARGET:
SCA Policy Framework
DESCRIPTION:
Qualifiers are defined for intents by defining a new intent with a dot
qualified name, where the name following the dot is the qualifier. A more
structurally obvious technique for defining qualifiers should be investigated.
One proposal from Ashok looks like this:
<intents xmlns="http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0" >
<intent name="confidentiality" appliesTo="" requires="">
<description> Communication through this binding must prevent
unauthorized
users from reading the messages.</description>
<qualifier name = "transport" />
<qualifier name = "message" />
</intent>
</intents>
PROPOSAL: none
PROVENANCE: SCA-208
Dave Booz
STSM, SCA and WebSphere Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie,
NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
http://washome.austin.ibm.com/xwiki/bin/view/SCA2Team/WebHome