Re: [sca-policy] Errata for the SCA Policy Framework Specification

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

What is the process? Are we going to turns these into issues?
... and hopefully accept the resolution right away?

OR is the errata going to be accepted without raising issues?

-Anish
--

Michael Rowley wrote:
>  
> 
> On behalf of BEA Systems, I hereby contribute the following suggested 
> errata for the SCA Policy Framework Specification.
> 
>  
> 
> The line numbers and section numbers are based on the corresponding 
> input specification for this TC.
> 
>  
> 
> Michael Rowley
> 
>  
> 
> 
>       *1. Policy Set provides attribute is optional*
> 
> In the pseudo-schema PolicySet/@provides is optional (line 245) and the 
> actual schema (line 1485) agrees. Both are incorrect. 
> PolicySet/@provides is required. (Line #s are from the published 
> official specs.)
> 
> 
>       *2. Rules for matching intents to policySets need to be clarified*
> 
> Section 1.4.10 describes the algorithm for mapping intents to 
> policySets. Remove the parenthetical statement from lines 894 and 895. 
> Move lines 899-903 inclusive following line 893.
> 
> 
>       *3. Extraneous reference in the References section*
> 
> Delete lines 1542 and 1543. The reference item 3^ 
> <http://www.osoa.org/pages/createpage.action?spaceKey=Main&title=3&linkCreation=true&fromPageId=4188> 
> is never referenced from the body of the specification.
> 
>  
>