Re: [sca-policy] Wording for Issue 24

[ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>]

Good suggestion. Thanks!
Ashok

Natale, Bob wrote:

> Hi Ashok,
>
> Concerning the wording of this paragraph from the top of p.2:
>
> "An intent that can be completely satisfied by one of a choice of 
> lower-level intents is referred to as a qualifiable intent. In order 
> to express such intents, the intent name may contain a qualifier, “.”. 
> An intent that includes _the name of a qualifiable intent_ in its name 
> is referred to as a qualified intent, because it is “qualifying” how 
> the qualifiable intent is satisfied. A qualified intent can only 
> qualify one qualifiable intent, so the name of the qualified intent 
> includes the name of the qualifiable intent as a prefix (separated by 
> “.”), for example, authentication.message. See Usage of @requires 
> attribute for specifying intents."
>
> ...It seems that the 3rd sentence might be better stated as:
>
> "An intent that includes _a qualifier_ in its name is referred to as a 
> qualified intent, because it is “qualifying” how the qualifiable 
> intent is satisfied."
>
> (Underline added just for clarity here -- not intended for the actual 
> text.)
> Cheers,
> BobN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ashok malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 8:42 AM
> To: OASIS Policy
> Subject: [sca-policy] Wording for Issue 24
>
> As requested, I have created wording changes in sections 3.1 and 3.2 
> of the
> Policy Framework document to resolve issue 24.. Additional changes may be
> needed in other sections to indicate how the intent defaults would be
> used. We
> need to discuss these changes.
> --
> All the best, Ashok



-- 
All the best, Ashok