sca-policy message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-policy] ISSUE 35: Define Conformance Target - proposal
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:53:37 +0000
+1
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
|
To:
| sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Date:
| 04/11/2008 13:01
|
Subject:
| [sca-policy] ISSUE 35: Define Conformance
Target - proposal |
Policy Issue 35 (http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-35)
asks for the definition of conformance targets to be used when we write
RFC2119 into the spec. As we're about to embark on this exercise, this
issue needs to be resolved.
Back in Jan of this year, the Open CSA Liason TC made a recommendation
in this email: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-policy/email/archives/200801/msg00020.html
I propose that we resolve Issue 35 using that email.
FWIW, the Assembly TC resolved issue ASSEMBLY-11 (http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-11)
in the same way. It's good to be consistent.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]