Re: [sca-policy] Action 20080112-02: (Ashok) Raise an issue regarding theplaces where interaction intents can be attached

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

On your point 1, the spec already says that impl intents can be attached to bindings. Do you want to change that?


Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

ashok malhotra ---01/14/2009 02:24:24 PM---When we resolved issue 44 we added a attribute to the intent definition XSD called intentType which

From:	ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
To:	OASIS Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	01/14/2009 02:24 PM
Subject:	[sca-policy] Action 20080112-02: (Ashok) Raise an issue regarding the places where interaction intents can be attached

---

When we resolved issue 44 we added a attribute to the intent definition 
XSD called intentType which can have its value 'interaction' or 
'implementation'.   I would like to raise 2 issues wrt to this.

1. We need to say that implementation intents MUST be attached only to 
implementations and interaction intents MUST be attached to references, 
services, bindings, etc.
A possible complication is that either type of intent may be associated 
with 'component' and inherited downwards.

2. The schema could be tightened up to say that only the two values 
'interaction' or 'implementation' are allowed for this attribute.
-- 
All the best, Ashok

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php