From: David Booz [mailto:booz@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 05 February 2009 14:15
To: sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [sca-policy] Comments on CD01 - Revision 13d- MC
conformance proposal
From Ashok's email:
1) is not Martin's change, it's an incomplete change from me. Need to speak
with Mike E before it's complete.
2), 3), 4) +1
I am happy to merge Martin's work (and any deltas on that work) on top of the
latest RFC2119 draft. Mike E is taking the pen now to do his todo's so I will
wait until he's done.
I have a few comments:
A) All the statements begin 'if marked', or something similar, can we find a
better wording? How about something like 'When present' or 'When attached'?
[<MartinC>] If reworded to say “when
XXX is present”
B) POL100003 - Doesn't mean what you've written. In plain terms, I think it
means 'the binding has to support the JMS API because the application wants to
take advantage of that'....which IMO is analogous to...the assembler MUST put
binding.jms at this point in the assembly.
[<MartinC>] Not sure I understand
the point here . I don’t think we can put normative statements on an
assembler! Have a look at my suggested rewording.
thanks
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
ashok malhotra ---02/04/2009 04:44:03 PM---1) Lines 885
-891 The paragraph that starts "During the deployment of an SCA policySet
..."
From:
|
ashok malhotra
<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
|
To:
|
Martin Chapman
<martin.chapman@oracle.com>, OASIS Policy
<sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
|
02/04/2009 04:44 PM
|
Subject:
|
[sca-policy] Comments on CD01 - Revision 13d-
MC conformance proposal
|
1) Lines 885 -891
The paragraph that starts "During the deployment of an SCA policySet
..."
This ends with "I forget the third option right now"
2) Section 7.1
In the conformance wording for the 3 intents remove the words "and has
not been qualified"
3) Typo on line 1801 "altertered."
4) Section 7.2.1 Change line 1814 from "to the transport" to
"to the
transport or transfer"
May be good to add, "such as HTTPS".
This needs to be fixed.
The other concern is that you and Dave seem to have made changes to the
same base document.
So, your changes will need to be merged.
--
All the best, Ashok
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php