Re: [sca-policy] TA 30008

[ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>]

Ah!  Yes, @provides on policySets, not @requires.

All the best, Ashok


David Booz wrote:
>
> Assuming you meant @provides on policySet, then I agree. +1
>
>
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
>
> Inactive hide details for ashok malhotra ---04/06/2009 02:26:17 
> PM---The @requires attribute for policySets can contain a list ashok 
> malhotra ---04/06/2009 02:26:17 PM---The @requires attribute for 
> policySets can contain a list of qualified and unqualified intents.
>
>
> From: 	
> ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
>
> To: 	
> OASIS Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>
>
> Date: 	
> 04/06/2009 02:26 PM
>
> Subject: 	
> [sca-policy] TA 30008
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> The @requires attribute for policySets can contain a list of qualified
> and unqualified intents.
> For each unqualified intent the policySet can contain an intentMap that
> lists the policy for each qualifier for that
> intent.  
>
> The question in my mind was "Can there be intentMap corresponding to a
> qualified intent in the @requires of a policySet?"
>
> Conformance statements 3008 and 30010 make it clear that intentMaps can
> only appear for unqualified intents in the
> @requires of a policySet.  See below:
>
> When a policySet element contains a set of intentMap children, the value
> of the @provides attribute of each intentMap MUST correspond to an
> unqualified intent that is listed within the @provides attribute value
> of the parent policySet element. [POL30008 <#POL30008>]
>
> For each qualifiable intent listed as a member of the @provides
> attribute list of a policySet element, there MUST be no more than one
> corresponding intentMap element that declares the unqualified form of
> that intent in its @provides attribute. In other words, each intentMap
> within a given policySet uniquely provides for a specific intent.
> [POL30010 <#POL30010>]
>
> Thus, the predicate of TA 30008 which says "The value of the @provides"
> attribute of each child <intentMap> corresponds to an unqualified intent
> listed in the @provides attribute of the parent policySet"
> is correct and no change is required.
>
> -- 
> All the best, Ashok
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>
>