Re: [sca-policy] Intents attached to WSDL

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Ashok,

I would like to get all the Policy related
statements in Assembly moved out and into the Policy spec.

I would be happy to help steer the necessary
Issue through the Assembly TC.


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
To:	oasis Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>, OASIS Assembly Test <sca-assembly-testing@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	05/05/2009 13:32
Subject:	[sca-policy] Intents attached to WSDL

---

The Assembly spec says:
Any service or reference that uses an interface marked with intents MUST
implicitly add those intents to its own @requires list. [ASM80008]

The corresponding statement in the Policy Spec is not as clear or 
definitive.  So, a few questions:

1. Should this be moved to the Policy Spec?  Or, at least we should
have 
an equivalent statement in the Policy Spec.
2. Why isn't there a corresponding WSDL extension for policySets?
3. WS-Policy defines a WSDL extension for WS-Policy.  Thus, users
can 
attach policies in WS-Policy syntax to WSDL interfaces.  What should
SCA 
do about them?
-- 
All the best, Ashok

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU