Fw: [sca-policy-comment] ISSUE-88: Attaching intents to WSDL definitions

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-88

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM on 06/23/2009 08:10 PM -----

From:	ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
To:	OASIS Policy <sca-policy-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	06/18/2009 06:40 PM
Subject:	[sca-policy-comment] Attaching intents to WSDL definitions

---

The SCA Policy Spec says "For WSDL Port Type elements (WSDL 1.1) and for 
WSDL Interface elements (WSDL 2.0), the @requires attribute can be 
applied that holds a list of intent names that are needed by the 
interface. "

The SCA Assembly spec is clearer and more specific.  It has a 
conformance statement that says:
"Any service or reference that uses an interface marked with intents 
MUST implicitly add those intents to its own
@requires list".

Should the conformance statement be moved from the Assembly spec to the 
Policy Spec?
-- 
All the best, Ashok

--
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Service Component Architecture / Policy (SCA-Policy) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: sca-policy-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: sca-policy-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: sca-policy-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-policy-comment/
Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=sca-policy
Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/