Suggested wording to resolve issue 88

[ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>]

Here is suggested wording to resolve issue 88 
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-88

Section 4.1 Attachment Rules - Intents says

“… Intents can also be applied to interface definitions. For WSDL Port 
Type elements (WSDL 1.1) and for WSDL Interface elements (WSDL 2.0), the 
@requires attribute can be applied that holds a list of intent names 
that are needed by the interface.”

Following this, add: “Any intents attached to a WSDL interface MUST be 
added to the intents defined in the @requires list of the service or 
reference to which the interface applies. If the @requires list of the 
service or reference is empty then the intents attached to the WSDL 
interface will become the only contents of the relevant @requires list.”

Since this wording includes a MUST, this should be added as a new 
conformance assertion and the TA document modified appropriately.
-- 
All the best, Ashok