[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: NEW ISSUE: Clarify meaning of 'does not have to support intents' inConformance section
TARGET: SCA Policy FW spec CD02/PR01
DESCRIPTION:
Section 11 Conformance states (line 2346):
'The implementation does not have to support any intents listed in this specification, and MAY reject SCDL documents that contain them.'
Also consider that POL30024 says the following:
'An SCA Runtime MUST include in the Domain the set of intent definitions contained in the Policy_Intents_Definitions.xml described in the appendix "Intent Definitions" of the SCA Policy specification.'
What does it mean to support an intent? Section 11 needs to be clarified.
PROPOSAL:
None.
This completes my outstanding AI: 20090727-01: status=pending: Dave to raise an issue against the Policy spec to deal with the inconsistency relating to the support of intents.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]