Re: [sca-policy] Wording for Issue 87

[ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>]

Mike:
We need to change the name from Infoset for External Attachment because 
we are extending its usage.
I picked Domain Composite Infoset because that name was used in some 
email.  I'm not married to it.
All the best, Ashok


Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> Ashok,
>
> Unfortunately, your changes are claimed to be against 
> sca-policy-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4, but the line numbers don't
> match the PDF (or the Word version either, for me), so it is very hard 
> to work out your changes.
>
> I am generally OK with the changes, but I don't like the name "Domain 
> Composite Infoset" since it has the implication
> that there is only a single composite involved - ie. the Domain 
> Composite - when this is as far from the truth as possible.
> I think that a term is needed that gives the concept that all 
> Composites deployed in the domain are in the infoset, something
> like "Deployed Composites Infoset".
>
> I'm not good at names, so if someone can come up with a better term, 
> I'll be happy with that.
>
>
> Yours,  Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
> Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
>
>
> From: 	ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
> To: 	OASIS Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Date: 	29/09/2009 22:15
> Subject: 	[sca-policy] Wording for Issue 87
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> The discussion on Issue 87 on the last telcon moved to consider the
> suggestion that the XPath value
> of the @appliesTo attribute of policySets be evaluated against the
> Domain Composite Infoset.
> It was argued that this was simpler than resetting the context item to
> the parent of the binding/implementation
> everytime the XPath needed to be evaluated.
>
> Accordingly, I have prepared wording that incorporates this change.  In
> doing this I have assumed that
> the resolution to issue 107 will result in an Appendix that spells out
> how the Infoset is constructed.
>
> The suggested changes are attached.
> -- 
> All the best, Ashok
> [attachment "Issue 87 Wording.doc" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
> 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>