[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Wording for Issue 106
This issue has to do with the evolution of intents as the Policy Framework spec evolves. Note that section 3.1 of the spec says "SCA normatively defines a set of core intents that all SCA implementations are expected to support, to ensure a minimum level of portability. Users of SCA can define new intents, or extend the qualifier set of existing intents." So the question remaining is, what about new intents or changes to intents on subsequent revisions of the Policy Framework spec. To clarify this, I suggest we add the following words of a final, standalone, paragraph at the end of section 3.1. The normatively defined intents in the SCA specification may evolve in future versions of this specification New intents may be added, additional qualifiers may be added to existing intents and the default qualifier for existing intents may change. Such changes would cause the namespace for the SCA specification to change. -- All the best, Ashok
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]